REVIEW 1 cited by
Probing the decay $A^0\to h^0 Z^{(*)}$ in Two-Higgs-Doublet Models in the inverted hierarchy scenario at the Large Hadron Collider
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Searches are being carried out at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) for the decay of the CP-odd scalar ($A^0$) in Two-Higgs-Doublet Models (2HDMs) with Natural Flavour Conservation (NFC) in the channel $A^0\to h^0 Z$, where $h^0$ is either the discovered 125 GeV Higgs boson or is an undiscovered CP-even scalar with a mass below 125 GeV. The latter possibility is called the "inverted hierarchy scenario" (IH) and would provide the opportunity of simultaneous discovery of two scalars. In both searches the selection cuts are optimised for the case of an on-shell $Z$ boson. For the case of the $Z$ boson being off-shell (denoted by $Z^*$, for which $m_{A^0} - m_{h^0}<m_Z$) no limits are set on the relevant 2HDM parameters from this process. It is known that the decay $A^0\to h^0 Z^*$ can have a large branching ratio (BR) in 2HDMs (especially in the Type I structure). In the context of the IH scenario and developing our previous work, we calculate the signal cross section $\sigma(gg\to A^0)\times {\rm BR}(A^0\to h^0Z^{(*)})\times {\rm BR}(h^0\to b\overline b,\tau\overline \tau)$ in the four types of 2HDMs with NFC. We also suggest some selection cuts that could provide sensitivity to $A^0\to h^0 Z^*$ in the IH scenario.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Optimizing $pp\to A\to Z^{*}h\to \ell^+\ell^- b\bar b$ Searches at the LHC in the 2HDM Type-I with Inverted Hierarchy
In 2HDM Type-I with inverted hierarchy, applying m_ll in 20-50 GeV and m_bb below 100 GeV makes A to Z* h to ll bb stand out against Drell-Yan and ttbar backgrounds.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.