Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Training Large-Scale Optical Neural Networks with Two-Pass Forward Propagation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.08337 v1 pith:MWNTJXBF submitted 2024-08-15 cs.LG physics.optics

classification cs.LGphysics.optics
keywords networksneuralopticaltrainingdataefficiencyforwardnonlinear
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper addresses the limitations in Optical Neural Networks (ONNs) related to training efficiency, nonlinear function implementation, and large input data processing. We introduce Two-Pass Forward Propagation, a novel training method that avoids specific nonlinear activation functions by modulating and re-entering error with random noise. Additionally, we propose a new way to implement convolutional neural networks using simple neural networks in integrated optical systems. Theoretical foundations and numerical results demonstrate significant improvements in training speed, energy efficiency, and scalability, advancing the potential of optical computing for complex data tasks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Strategic Alignment Patterns in National AI Policies

    cs.CY 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A policy-analysis preprint scores alignment between objectives, foresight, and instruments in 15-20 national AI strategies, claiming distinct governance-based archetypes, but ships no data, figures, or code to support...

  2. Optical Physics-Based Generative Models

    physics.optics 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Optical wave equations are claimed to work as generative models with big efficiency gains, but the derivations contain algebraic sign errors and the reported FID scores are mutually inconsistent.

Pith tools