Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Vulnerability Handling of AI-Generated Code -- Existing Solutions and Open Challenges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.08549 v1 pith:DLWVFFW3 submitted 2024-08-16 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords codevulnerabilityai-generatedhandlingchallengesprocessesvulnerabilitiesapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The increasing use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in modern software engineering, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation, has transformed professional software development by boosting productivity and automating development processes. This adoption, however, has highlighted a significant issue: the introduction of security vulnerabilities into the code. These vulnerabilities result, e.g., from flaws in the training data that propagate into the generated code, creating challenges in disclosing them. Traditional vulnerability handling processes often involve extensive manual review. Applying such traditional processes to AI-generated code is challenging. AI-generated code may include several vulnerabilities, possibly in slightly different forms as developers might not build on already implemented code but prompt similar tasks. In this work, we explore the current state of LLM-based approaches for vulnerability handling, focusing on approaches for vulnerability detection, localization, and repair. We provide an overview of recent progress in this area and highlight open challenges that must be addressed in order to establish a reliable and scalable vulnerability handling process of AI-generated code.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How Propense Are Large Language Models at Producing Code Smells? A Benchmarking Study

    cs.SE 2024-12 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark scores LLMs' tendency to generate code smells by aggregating token-level probabilities over smell locations in existing code.

  2. Applied Statistics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: A Review and Vision

    stat.AP 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review and vision paper: applied statistics and AI are complementary, and statisticians should focus on uniquely human skills as AI automates routine analysis.

Pith tools