Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

FLEXTAF: Enhancing Table Reasoning with Flexible Tabular Formats

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.08841 v2 pith:DKUFQ3ZB submitted 2024-08-16 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords tabulardifferenttableformatsmodelsreasoningformatperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The table reasoning task aims to answer the question according to the given table. Currently, using Large Language Models (LLMs) is the predominant method for table reasoning. Most existing methods employ a fixed tabular format to represent the table, which could limit the performance. Given that each instance requires different capabilities and models possess varying abilities, we assert that different instances and models suit different tabular formats. We prove the aforementioned claim through quantitative analysis of experimental results, where different instances and models achieve different performances using various tabular formats. Building on this discussion, we propose FLEXTAF-Single and FLEXTAF-Vote to enhance table reasoning performance by employing flexible tabular formats. Specifically, (i) FLEXTAF-Single trains a classifier to predict the most suitable tabular format based on the instance and the LLM. (ii) FLEXTAF-Vote integrates the results across different formats. Our experiments on WikiTableQuestions and TabFact reveal significant improvements, with average gains of 2.3% and 4.8% compared to the best performance achieved using a fixed tabular format with greedy decoding and self-consistency decoding, thereby validating the effectiveness of our methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Table Understanding and (Multimodal) LLMs: A Cross-Domain Case Study on Scientific vs. Non-Scientific Data

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark, TableEval, with 3017 tables in five formats, shows LLMs are robust to table representation but perform worse on scientific tables, with the caveat that the domain gap is confounded by task difficulty.

  2. Format-Adapter: Improving Reasoning Capability of LLMs by Adapting Suitable Format

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FORMAT-ADAPTER automatically generates and selects per-question reasoning formats for LLMs, improving vote-based accuracy by around 4.3% over prior multi-format methods.

Pith tools