REVIEW 3 cited by
Visual Agents as Fast and Slow Thinkers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Achieving human-level intelligence requires refining cognitive distinctions between System 1 and System 2 thinking. While contemporary AI, driven by large language models, demonstrates human-like traits, it falls short of genuine cognition. Transitioning from structured benchmarks to real-world scenarios presents challenges for visual agents, often leading to inaccurate and overly confident responses. To address the challenge, we introduce FaST, which incorporates the Fast and Slow Thinking mechanism into visual agents. FaST employs a switch adapter to dynamically select between System 1/2 modes, tailoring the problem-solving approach to different task complexity. It tackles uncertain and unseen objects by adjusting model confidence and integrating new contextual data. With this novel design, we advocate a flexible system, hierarchical reasoning capabilities, and a transparent decision-making pipeline, all of which contribute to its ability to emulate human-like cognitive processes in visual intelligence. Empirical results demonstrate that FaST outperforms various well-known baselines, achieving 80.8% accuracy over VQA^{v2} for visual question answering and 48.7% GIoU score over ReasonSeg for reasoning segmentation, demonstrate FaST's superior performance. Extensive testing validates the efficacy and robustness of FaST's core components, showcasing its potential to advance the development of cognitive visual agents in AI systems. The code is available at ttps://github.com/GuangyanS/Sys2-LLaVA.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Fully Spiking Neural Networks with Target Awareness for Energy-Efficient UAV Tracking
A two-stage pure RL method with an information-gap global view and hierarchical grounding loss makes MLLMs truly rely on precise crops and sets SOTA on high-res VQA under tight token budgets.
-
HART: High-Resolution Annotation-Free Reasoning Technique through a Closed-loop Framework
HART uses a closed-loop 'crop-and-answer' training scheme plus a dynamic-weight GRPO variant to improve LMM grounding and high-resolution reasoning without bounding-box annotations.
-
Towards Video Thinking Test: A Holistic Benchmark for Advanced Video Reasoning and Understanding
A new 1,000-video benchmark with adversarial question variants shows video LLMs remain far below human accuracy and robustness on short real-world videos.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.