Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Hassle-free Algorithm for Private Learning in Practice: Don't Use Tree Aggregation, Use BLTs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.08868 v3 pith:VDKSECHB submitted 2024-08-16 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords aggregationtreematrixprivacyadvantagesalgorithmblt-dp-ftrldp-ftrl
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The state-of-the-art for training on-device language models for mobile keyboard applications combines federated learning (FL) with differential privacy (DP) via the DP-Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (DP-FTRL) algorithm. Two variants of DP-FTRL are used in practice, tree aggregation and matrix factorization. However, tree aggregation suffers from significantly suboptimal privacy/utility tradeoffs, while matrix mechanisms require expensive optimization parameterized by hard-to-estimate-in-advance constants, and high runtime memory costs. This paper extends the recently introduced Buffered Linear Toeplitz (BLT) mechanism to multi-participation scenarios. Our BLT-DP-FTRL maintains the ease-of-use advantages of tree aggregation, while essentially matching matrix factorization in terms of utility and privacy. We evaluate BLT-DP-FTRL on the StackOverflow dataset, serving as a re-producible simulation benchmark, and across four on-device language model tasks in a production FL system. Our empirical results highlight the advantages of the BLT mechanism and elevate the practicality and effectiveness of DP in real-world scenarios.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Edit-Neighboring Data Streams and Privacy under Continual Observation

    cs.DS 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    Under the new 'edit-neighboring' privacy definition, private continual counting is possible with only polylogarithmic error, while every additive-noise counter provably needs polynomial error.

  2. Securing Private Federated Learning in a Malicious Setting: A Scalable TEE-Based Approach with Client Auditing

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper shows that an ephemeral TEE planner with randomized client auditing can realize DP-FTRL under a malicious server with small constant client overhead.

  3. How to DP-fy Your Data: A Practical Guide to Generating Synthetic Data With Differential Privacy

    cs.CR 2025-12 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A practical, extremely thorough survey of differentially private synthetic data generation: methods, privacy units, evaluation metrics, and end-to-end system components across four data modalities.

Pith tools