REVIEW 3 cited by
A Hassle-free Algorithm for Private Learning in Practice: Don't Use Tree Aggregation, Use BLTs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The state-of-the-art for training on-device language models for mobile keyboard applications combines federated learning (FL) with differential privacy (DP) via the DP-Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (DP-FTRL) algorithm. Two variants of DP-FTRL are used in practice, tree aggregation and matrix factorization. However, tree aggregation suffers from significantly suboptimal privacy/utility tradeoffs, while matrix mechanisms require expensive optimization parameterized by hard-to-estimate-in-advance constants, and high runtime memory costs. This paper extends the recently introduced Buffered Linear Toeplitz (BLT) mechanism to multi-participation scenarios. Our BLT-DP-FTRL maintains the ease-of-use advantages of tree aggregation, while essentially matching matrix factorization in terms of utility and privacy. We evaluate BLT-DP-FTRL on the StackOverflow dataset, serving as a re-producible simulation benchmark, and across four on-device language model tasks in a production FL system. Our empirical results highlight the advantages of the BLT mechanism and elevate the practicality and effectiveness of DP in real-world scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Edit-Neighboring Data Streams and Privacy under Continual Observation
Under the new 'edit-neighboring' privacy definition, private continual counting is possible with only polylogarithmic error, while every additive-noise counter provably needs polynomial error.
-
Securing Private Federated Learning in a Malicious Setting: A Scalable TEE-Based Approach with Client Auditing
The paper shows that an ephemeral TEE planner with randomized client auditing can realize DP-FTRL under a malicious server with small constant client overhead.
-
How to DP-fy Your Data: A Practical Guide to Generating Synthetic Data With Differential Privacy
A practical, extremely thorough survey of differentially private synthetic data generation: methods, privacy units, evaluation metrics, and end-to-end system components across four data modalities.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.