REVIEW 1 cited by
Automatic Metrics in Natural Language Generation: A Survey of Current Evaluation Practices
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Automatic metrics are extensively used to evaluate natural language processing systems. However, there has been increasing focus on how they are used and reported by practitioners within the field. In this paper, we have conducted a survey on the use of automatic metrics, focusing particularly on natural language generation (NLG) tasks. We inspect which metrics are used as well as why they are chosen and how their use is reported. Our findings from this survey reveal significant shortcomings, including inappropriate metric usage, lack of implementation details and missing correlations with human judgements. We conclude with recommendations that we believe authors should follow to enable more rigour within the field.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
From Vision To Language through Graph of Events in Space and Time: An Explainable Self-supervised Approach
The paper presents GEST, an event-graph representation of videos that is converted automatically into natural language and is also used as a teacher to pre-train end-to-end video captioning models.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.