Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.09647 v2 pith:6G7GE3D5 submitted 2024-08-19 cs.CV

C2P-CLIP: Injecting Category Common Prompt in CLIP to Enhance Generalization in Deepfake Detection

classification cs.CV
keywords detectionclipcategorycommondeepfakepromptc2p-clipconcepts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This work focuses on AIGC detection to develop universal detectors capable of identifying various types of forgery images. Recent studies have found large pre-trained models, such as CLIP, are effective for generalizable deepfake detection along with linear classifiers. However, two critical issues remain unresolved: 1) understanding why CLIP features are effective on deepfake detection through a linear classifier; and 2) exploring the detection potential of CLIP. In this study, we delve into the underlying mechanisms of CLIP's detection capabilities by decoding its detection features into text and performing word frequency analysis. Our finding indicates that CLIP detects deepfakes by recognizing similar concepts (Fig. \ref{fig:fig1} a). Building on this insight, we introduce Category Common Prompt CLIP, called C2P-CLIP, which integrates the category common prompt into the text encoder to inject category-related concepts into the image encoder, thereby enhancing detection performance (Fig. \ref{fig:fig1} b). Our method achieves a 12.41\% improvement in detection accuracy compared to the original CLIP, without introducing additional parameters during testing. Comprehensive experiments conducted on two widely-used datasets, encompassing 20 generation models, validate the efficacy of the proposed method, demonstrating state-of-the-art performance. The code is available at \url{https://github.com/chuangchuangtan/C2P-CLIP-DeepfakeDetection}

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SPARK-IL: Spectral Retrieval-Augmented RAG for Knowledge-driven Deepfake Detection via Incremental Learning

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SPARK-IL reaches 94.6% mean accuracy on deepfake detection across 19 generators by fusing multi-band spectral embeddings from ViT and RGB paths, retrieving nearest signatures for majority voting, and using incremental...

  2. VendorBench-100: A Unified Cross-Paradigm Benchmark for Deepfake Image Detection

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A 100-image cross-paradigm benchmark of 36 deepfake detectors reveals that ROC-AUC and MCC diverge sharply, meaning strong class-separation ranking does not guarantee reliable default-threshold decisions.

  3. Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Image Detection

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The Counter Turing Test competition finds F1-scores above 0.83 for binary real-vs-AI classification but only 0.4986 at best for identifying the specific generative model.

  4. Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Image Detection

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A competition using a new 50k-image dataset found high accuracy in binary real-vs-AI detection but only modest success in identifying the exact generative model.

  5. Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Image Detection

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Binary AI vs. real image classification reaches F1 > 0.83 while identifying the exact generative model achieves a highest F1 of 0.4986 on the MS COCOAI dataset.