REVIEW 3 cited by
Mistral-SPLADE: LLMs for better Learned Sparse Retrieval
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Learned Sparse Retrievers (LSR) have evolved into an effective retrieval strategy that can bridge the gap between traditional keyword-based sparse retrievers and embedding-based dense retrievers. At its core, learned sparse retrievers try to learn the most important semantic keyword expansions from a query and/or document which can facilitate better retrieval with overlapping keyword expansions. LSR like SPLADE has typically been using encoder only models with MLM (masked language modeling) style objective in conjunction with known ways of retrieval performance improvement such as hard negative mining, distillation, etc. In this work, we propose to use decoder-only model for learning semantic keyword expansion. We posit, decoder only models that have seen much higher magnitudes of data are better equipped to learn keyword expansions needed for improved retrieval. We use Mistral as the backbone to develop our Learned Sparse Retriever similar to SPLADE and train it on a subset of sentence-transformer data which is often used for training text embedding models. Our experiments support the hypothesis that a sparse retrieval model based on decoder only large language model (LLM) surpasses the performance of existing LSR systems, including SPLADE and all its variants. The LLM based model (Echo-Mistral-SPLADE) now stands as a state-of-the-art learned sparse retrieval model on the BEIR text retrieval benchmark.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
UEmbed: Unified Sparse and Dense Multimodal Embeddings
UEmbed uses 16 special tokens over a partitioned vocabulary to make a decoder-only multimodal model emit dense and sparse embeddings in one forward pass; the 9B model scores 71.8 dense / 71.0 sparse on MMEB-v2.
-
Leveraging Decoder Architectures for Learned Sparse Retrieval
For learned sparse retrieval, an encoder-decoder model that copies input to the decoder and max-pools MLM logits over all positions outperforms encoder-only and decoder-only backbones on MS MARCO.
-
LLMs are Also Effective Embedding Models: An In-depth Overview
A structured survey of using decoder-only LLMs as text embedding models, covering prompting, fine-tuning, data construction, benchmarks, and open problems.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.