Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

SCANS: Mitigating the Exaggerated Safety for LLMs via Safety-Conscious Activation Steering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.11491 v2 pith:E34YGTAQ submitted 2024-08-21 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords safetyscansexaggeratedllmssteeringactivationmodelbehavior
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Safety alignment is indispensable for Large Language Models (LLMs) to defend threats from malicious instructions. However, recent researches reveal safety-aligned LLMs prone to reject benign queries due to the exaggerated safety issue, limiting their helpfulness. In this paper, we propose a Safety-Conscious Activation Steering (SCANS) method to mitigate the exaggerated safety concerns in aligned LLMs. First, SCANS extracts the refusal steering vectors within the activation space and utilizes vocabulary projection to anchor some specific safety-critical layers which influence model refusal behavior. Second, by tracking the hidden state transition, SCANS identifies the steering direction and steers the model behavior accordingly, achieving a balance between exaggerated safety and adequate safety. Experiments show that SCANS achieves new state-of-the-art performance on XSTest and OKTest benchmarks, without impairing their defense capability against harmful queries and maintaining almost unchanged model capability.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. More Thinking, Less Seeing? Assessing Amplified Hallucination in Multimodal Reasoning Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Reasoning models trade visual grounding for language-based inference, and this paper measures that trade-off with a new metric and benchmark.

  2. Just Enough Shifts: Mitigating Over-Refusal in Aligned Language Models with Targeted Representation Fine-Tuning

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning a single transformer layer with activation targets scaled by each query's projection onto a refusal direction reduces over-refusal on four benchmarks while preserving safety and general capability.

  3. PII Jailbreaking in LLMs via Activation Steering Reveals Personal Information Leakage

    cs.CR 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Activation steering on probe-selected attention heads flips LLM privacy refusals into disclosures, with claims of high rates of factually correct personal information leakage.

Pith tools