Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

EE-MLLM: A Data-Efficient and Compute-Efficient Multimodal Large Language Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.11795 v3 pith:XKZXOAW3 submitted 2024-08-21 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords textbfee-mllmefficiencydatalanguagemechanismacrossapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Recent advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated satisfactory performance across various vision-language tasks. Current approaches for vision and language interaction fall into two categories: self-attention-based and cross-attention-based methods. However, both approaches present inherent limitations, forcing a trade-off between data and computational efficiency. To address this issue, we introduce the Data-$\textbf{E}$fficient and Compute-$\textbf{E}$fficient $\textbf{MLLM}$ ($\textbf{EE-MLLM}$). Specifically, we modify the original self-attention mechanism in MLLM to a composite attention mechanism. This mechanism has two key characteristics: 1) eliminating the computational overhead of self-attention among visual tokens to achieve $\textbf{compute efficiency}$, and 2) reusing the weights from each layer of LLM to facilitate effective vision-language modality alignment for $\textbf{data efficiency}$. As a result, EE-MLLM significantly outperforms Flamingo with limited training data, and reduces the prefilling time to 79 ms on an H800 GPU, compared to LLaVA's 277 ms. To further investigate the efficiency of EE-MLLM, we present a training-free variant named EE-MLLM-F, which reduces the computation cost of self-attention-based method without additional training. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of EE-MLLM across a range of benchmarks, including general-purpose datasets like MMBench and SeedBench, as well as fine-grained tasks such as TextVQA and DocVQA.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sample-efficient Integration of New Modalities into Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A hypernetwork trained on image, audio, and video adapts a shared projector to new, low-resource modalities from as few as 32 examples.

  2. Adaptive Classifier-Free Guidance via Dynamic Low-Confidence Masking

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adaptive Classifier-Free Guidance (A-CFG) re-masks low-confidence tokens in the unconditional input at each generation step, improving reasoning and planning accuracy for masked diffusion language models.

  3. Progressive Scaling Visual Object Tracking

    cs.CV 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A progressive scaling training strategy with small-teacher distillation and masked-input alignment improves tracking accuracy and powers a new 12-dataset benchmark.

  4. Streamline Without Sacrifice -- Squeeze out Computation Redundancy in LMM

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ProxyV introduces proxy vision tokens that take over expensive attention and feed-forward computation in later layers of decoder-only multimodal models, cutting FLOPs by 25-46% while retaining or improving accuracy on...

Pith tools