REVIEW 3 cited by
Anapole moment of neutrinos and radioactive sources near liquid xenon detectors
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We show that placing a radioactive source such as ${}^{51}$Cr near a liquid xenon detector may allow to detect the contribution induced by the anapole moment to neutrino-electron scattering in the Standard Model at the 1-2 $\sigma$ level. Although the anapole moment of neutrinos induces a scattering rate with the same spectral shape as the neutral and charged current contributions, exposures of $\sim$ 60 tonne $\times$ source run at XENONnT or XLZD may be enough to accumulate sufficient statistics for a detection. We also discuss a simple model where the anapole moment of neutrinos is enhanced or decreased with respect to the SM expectation, further demonstrating how a potential measurement of the anapole moment of neutrinos would allow to constrain new physics.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Testing the Gallium anomaly using Electron-Neutrino Scattering
A 51Cr source and electron-neutrino scattering in liquid scintillators could independently test the Gallium anomaly, estimate the 51Cr branching ratio, and probe sterile-neutrino baseline dependence.
-
Clarity through the Neutrino Fog: Constraining New Forces in Dark Matter Detectors
The first solar CEνNS data from PandaX-4T and XENONnT give world-leading laboratory constraints on light scalar and vector mediators for masses below about 50 MeV.
-
Elastic Neutrino-electron Scattering at the One-loop Level in the Standard Model
An updated complete one-loop Standard Model calculation of elastic neutrino-electron scattering, validated against prior calculations, is used to predict JUNO and TAO event rates.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.