Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Large Language Models as Foundations for Next-Gen Dense Retrieval: A Comprehensive Empirical Assessment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.12194 v2 pith:NB6Q3FJU submitted 2024-08-22 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords retrievalmodelsllmsaccuracybackbonedensedomaingeneralization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pretrained language models like BERT and T5 serve as crucial backbone encoders for dense retrieval. However, these models often exhibit limited generalization capabilities and face challenges in improving in domain accuracy. Recent research has explored using large language models (LLMs) as retrievers, achieving SOTA performance across various tasks. Despite these advancements, the specific benefits of LLMs over traditional retrievers and the impact of different LLM configurations, such as parameter sizes, pretraining duration, and alignment processes on retrieval tasks remain unclear. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study on a wide range of retrieval tasks, including in domain accuracy, data efficiency, zero shot generalization, lengthy retrieval, instruction based retrieval, and multi task learning. We evaluate over 15 different backbone LLMs and non LLMs. Our findings reveal that larger models and extensive pretraining consistently enhance in domain accuracy and data efficiency. Additionally, larger models demonstrate significant potential in zero shot generalization, lengthy retrieval, instruction based retrieval, and multi task learning. These results underscore the advantages of LLMs as versatile and effective backbone encoders in dense retrieval, providing valuable insights for future research and development in this field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLM-guided Hierarchical Search for End-to-end Reasoning Intensive Retrieval

    cs.IR 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM directly traverses a hierarchical semantic index of a corpus, using calibrated path-relevance scores to retrieve documents for reasoning-intensive queries.

  2. TongSearch-QR: Reinforced Query Reasoning for Retrieval

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    TongSearch-QR trains 1.5B and 7B models with GRPO and a frozen-embedding reward to rewrite queries, reaching 27.9 nDCG@10 on BRIGHT with BM25, above GPT-4o's 26.5.

  3. O1 Embedder: Let Retrievers Think Before Action

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A jointly trained retriever that first generates query thoughts and then encodes them improves accuracy on 12 retrieval benchmarks.

Pith tools