Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

What Makes a Good Story and How Can We Measure It? A Comprehensive Survey of Story Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.14622 v1 pith:SNQ4ZZSL submitted 2024-08-26 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords evaluationstorystoriestasksdevelopmentexistinggenerationmeasure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the development of artificial intelligence, particularly the success of Large Language Models (LLMs), the quantity and quality of automatically generated stories have significantly increased. This has led to the need for automatic story evaluation to assess the generative capabilities of computing systems and analyze the quality of both automatic-generated and human-written stories. Evaluating a story can be more challenging than other generation evaluation tasks. While tasks like machine translation primarily focus on assessing the aspects of fluency and accuracy, story evaluation demands complex additional measures such as overall coherence, character development, interestingness, etc. This requires a thorough review of relevant research. In this survey, we first summarize existing storytelling tasks, including text-to-text, visual-to-text, and text-to-visual. We highlight their evaluation challenges, identify various human criteria to measure stories, and present existing benchmark datasets. Then, we propose a taxonomy to organize evaluation metrics that have been developed or can be adopted for story evaluation. We also provide descriptions of these metrics, along with the discussion of their merits and limitations. Later, we discuss the human-AI collaboration for story evaluation and generation. Finally, we suggest potential future research directions, extending from story evaluation to general evaluations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Quality of Gaming Narratives Co-created with AI

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Experts rate 23 story quality dimensions for AI game narratives and predict their Kano categories, but player satisfaction is not measured.

  2. What to Ask Next? Probing the Imaginative Reasoning of LLMs with TurtleSoup Puzzles

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    TurtleSoup-Bench is a new interactive benchmark showing that LLMs struggle with imaginative reasoning compared to humans.

Pith tools