REVIEW 2 cited by
What Makes a Good Story and How Can We Measure It? A Comprehensive Survey of Story Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the development of artificial intelligence, particularly the success of Large Language Models (LLMs), the quantity and quality of automatically generated stories have significantly increased. This has led to the need for automatic story evaluation to assess the generative capabilities of computing systems and analyze the quality of both automatic-generated and human-written stories. Evaluating a story can be more challenging than other generation evaluation tasks. While tasks like machine translation primarily focus on assessing the aspects of fluency and accuracy, story evaluation demands complex additional measures such as overall coherence, character development, interestingness, etc. This requires a thorough review of relevant research. In this survey, we first summarize existing storytelling tasks, including text-to-text, visual-to-text, and text-to-visual. We highlight their evaluation challenges, identify various human criteria to measure stories, and present existing benchmark datasets. Then, we propose a taxonomy to organize evaluation metrics that have been developed or can be adopted for story evaluation. We also provide descriptions of these metrics, along with the discussion of their merits and limitations. Later, we discuss the human-AI collaboration for story evaluation and generation. Finally, we suggest potential future research directions, extending from story evaluation to general evaluations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Evaluating Quality of Gaming Narratives Co-created with AI
Experts rate 23 story quality dimensions for AI game narratives and predict their Kano categories, but player satisfaction is not measured.
-
What to Ask Next? Probing the Imaginative Reasoning of LLMs with TurtleSoup Puzzles
TurtleSoup-Bench is a new interactive benchmark showing that LLMs struggle with imaginative reasoning compared to humans.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.