Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Quality Assessment in the Era of Large Models: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.00031 v1 pith:ZQSMHKQR submitted 2024-08-17 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords assessmentmodelsqualitylargetasksdevelopmentresearcherssurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quality assessment, which evaluates the visual quality level of multimedia experiences, has garnered significant attention from researchers and has evolved substantially through dedicated efforts. Before the advent of large models, quality assessment typically relied on small expert models tailored for specific tasks. While these smaller models are effective at handling their designated tasks and predicting quality levels, they often lack explainability and robustness. With the advancement of large models, which align more closely with human cognitive and perceptual processes, many researchers are now leveraging the prior knowledge embedded in these large models for quality assessment tasks. This emergence of quality assessment within the context of large models motivates us to provide a comprehensive review focusing on two key aspects: 1) the assessment of large models, and 2) the role of large models in assessment tasks. We begin by reflecting on the historical development of quality assessment. Subsequently, we move to detailed discussions of related works concerning quality assessment in the era of large models. Finally, we offer insights into the future progression and potential pathways for quality assessment in this new era. We hope this survey will enable a rapid understanding of the development of quality assessment in the era of large models and inspire further advancements in the field.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Leveraging Vision-Language Models to Select Trustworthy Super-Resolution Samples Generated by Diffusion Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    VLM-based selection and ensembling of diffusion super-resolution samples is proposed, together with a hybrid Trustworthiness Score, but the score is partially fitted and its claimed human-preference correlation is not...

Pith tools