Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

(Un)physical consequences of "Quantum Measurements of Time"

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.00161 v1 pith:E5KGHLCM submitted 2024-08-30 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

Will Cavendish , Siddhant Das , Markus Nöth , Ali Ayatollah Rafsanjani This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.atom-ph
keywords quantumarrival-timeclockconsequencesempiricallettmacconemeasurements
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We note that the empirical predictions of the "Quantum Clock Proposal" [L. Maccone and K. Sacha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 110402 (2020)] are paradoxical when viewed as a solution to the quantum arrival-time problem.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum Measurements of Time: A reply to criticisms

    quant-ph 2025-01 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The authors claim all three criticisms of their time-of-arrival proposal are without merit, but the non-arrival probability rebuttal mislabels a standard tail integral.

Pith tools