REVIEW 2 cited by
Inference, interference and invariance: How the Quantum Fourier Transform can help to learn from data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
How can we take inspiration from a typical quantum algorithm to design heuristics for machine learning? A common blueprint, used from Deutsch-Josza to Shor's algorithm, is to place labeled information in superposition via an oracle, interfere in Fourier space, and measure. In this paper, we want to understand how this interference strategy can be used for inference, i.e. to generalize from finite data samples to a ground truth. Our investigative framework is built around the Hidden Subgroup Problem (HSP), which we transform into a learning task by replacing the oracle with classical training data. The standard quantum algorithm for solving the HSP uses the Quantum Fourier Transform to expose an invariant subspace, i.e., a subset of Hilbert space in which the hidden symmetry is manifest. Based on this insight, we propose an inference principle that "compares" the data to this invariant subspace, and suggest a concrete implementation via overlaps of quantum states. We hope that this leads to well-motivated quantum heuristics that can leverage symmetries for machine learning applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Quantum entanglement provides a competitive advantage in adversarial games
Entangled 8-qubit PQC feature extractors in PPO agents for Pong consistently beat separable PQCs of similar size and can match or exceed small classical MLPs in the low-parameter regime.
-
The role of data-induced randomness in quantum machine learning classification tasks
Introduces a class-margin metric connecting data-encoding randomness to quantum classification accuracy, and argues that near-random encodings fundamentally limit performance.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.