Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Probing the propeller regime with wide neutron star binaries

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena · Submitted 1 Sep 2024

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Unless a propeller with a very slow spin-down is operating, it is very improbable to find a system similar to SWIFT J0850.8-4219 at the propeller stage.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.57 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2409.00714 (version 1)
Pith ID665O4URX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationM.D. Afonina (SAI MSU), S.B. Popov (ICTP). "Probing the propeller regime with wide neutron star binaries." arXiv:2409.00714 (2024). https://pith.science/paper/665O4URX
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,251 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.48 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.96 · compares with prior results 0.11 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We model the duration of the propeller stage in wide binary systems with neutron stars and calculate the time of accretion onset for various propeller models. We apply our modeling to the symbiotic X-ray binary SWIFT J0850.8-4219. Unless a propeller with a very slow spin-down is operating, it is very improbable to find a system similar to SWIFT J0850.8-4219 at the propeller stage. Then we model the evolution of a neutron star in a binary with a solar-like companion. We calculate for which orbital separations and magnetic fields a neutron star can start to accrete while the companion is still on the Main sequence. We demonstrate that for the magnetic field $B\lesssim10^{12}$~G neutron stars at the orbital separation $a\gtrsim 1$~AU do not reach the propeller stage. In the case of a slow propeller spin-down, neutron stars never start to accrete. For the more rapid propeller spin-down, a neutron star can start to accrete or spend a long time at the propeller stage depending on the parameters.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We model the duration of the propeller stage in wide binary systems with neutron stars and calculate the time of accretion onset for various propeller models. contribution 0.76 0.95 0.05 asserted 0.87
s1 We apply our modeling to the symbiotic X-ray binary SWIFT J0850.8-4219. contribution 0.70 0.94 0.03 asserted 0.96
s2 Unless a propeller with a very slow spin-down is operating, it is very improbable to find a system similar to SWIFT J0850.8-4219 at the propeller stage. result 0.56 0.80 0.44 hedged possibility 0.57
s3 Then we model the evolution of a neutron star in a binary with a solar-like companion. contribution 0.59 0.92 0.03 asserted 0.77
s4 We calculate for which orbital separations and magnetic fields a neutron star can start to accrete while the companion is still on the Main sequence. method 0.53 0.93 0.07 asserted 0.61
s5 We demonstrate that for the magnetic field $B\lesssim10^{12}$~G neutron stars at the orbital separation $a\gtrsim 1$~AU do not reach the propeller stage. result 1.00 0.90 0.30 asserted 1.00
s6 In the case of a slow propeller spin-down, neutron stars never start to accrete. result 1.00 0.80 0.14 asserted 1.00
s7 For the more rapid propeller spin-down, a neutron star can start to accrete or spend a long time at the propeller stage depending on the parameters. result 0.98 0.87 0.20 hedged possibility 0.82

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.86 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.92.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We model the duration of the propeller stage in wide binary systems with neutron stars and calculate the time of accretion onset for various propeller models. We apply our modeling to the symbiotic X-ray binary SWIFT J0850.8-4219. Unless a propeller with a very slow spin-down is operating, it is very improbable to find a system similar to SWIFT J0850.8-4219 at the propeller stage. Then we model the evolution of a neutron star in a binary with a solar-like companion. We calculate for which orbital separations and magnetic fields a neutron star can start to accrete while the companion is still on the Main sequence. We demonstrate that for the magnetic field $B\lesssim10^{12}$~G neutron stars at the orbital separation $a\gtrsim 1$~AU do not reach the propeller stage. In the case of a slow propeller spin-down, neutron stars never start to accrete. For the more rapid propeller spin-down, a neutron star can start to accrete or spend a long time at the propeller stage depending on the parameters.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
Compares with it 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.