Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards Cross-Lingual Explanation of Artwork in Large-scale Vision Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.01584 v2 pith:TDHKBUWA submitted 2024-09-03 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords englishlvlmslanguagesvisiondatasetotheradditiondata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As the performance of Large-scale Vision Language Models (LVLMs) improves, they are increasingly capable of responding in multiple languages, and there is an expectation that the demand for explanations generated by LVLMs will grow. However, pre-training of Vision Encoder and the integrated training of LLMs with Vision Encoder are mainly conducted using English training data, leaving it uncertain whether LVLMs can completely handle their potential when generating explanations in languages other than English. In addition, multilingual QA benchmarks that create datasets using machine translation have cultural differences and biases, remaining issues for use as evaluation tasks. To address these challenges, this study created an extended dataset in multiple languages without relying on machine translation. This dataset that takes into account nuances and country-specific phrases was then used to evaluate the generation explanation abilities of LVLMs. Furthermore, this study examined whether Instruction-Tuning in resource-rich English improves performance in other languages. Our findings indicate that LVLMs perform worse in languages other than English compared to English. In addition, it was observed that LVLMs struggle to effectively manage the knowledge learned from English data. Our dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/naist-nlp/MultiExpArt

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CognArtive: Large Language Models for Automating Art Analysis and Decoding Aesthetic Elements

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A pipeline using GPT-4V with GPT-4 and Gemini 2.0 produces large-scale formal art analyses whose text embeddings show moderate similarity to style descriptions.

Pith tools