REVIEW 2 cited by
(Implicit) Ensembles of Ensembles: Epistemic Uncertainty Collapse in Large Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Epistemic uncertainty is crucial for safety-critical applications and data acquisition tasks. Yet, we find an important phenomenon in deep learning models: an epistemic uncertainty collapse as model complexity increases, challenging the assumption that larger models invariably offer better uncertainty quantification. We introduce implicit ensembling as a possible explanation for this phenomenon. To investigate this hypothesis, we provide theoretical analysis and experiments that demonstrate uncertainty collapse in explicit ensembles of ensembles and show experimental evidence of similar collapse in wider models across various architectures, from simple MLPs to state-of-the-art vision models including ResNets and Vision Transformers. We further develop implicit ensemble extraction techniques to decompose larger models into diverse sub-models, showing we can thus recover epistemic uncertainty. We explore the implications of these findings for uncertainty estimation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Covariance Last-Layer Ensembles: Function-Space Diversity for Efficient Uncertainty Quantification
Cov-LLE decorrelates member activations in function space, recovering substantial deep-ensemble diversity and calibration at 1× backbone cost, and a direction score repairs OC near-OOD detection.
-
Uncertainty Estimation using Variance-Gated Distributions
A variance-gated uncertainty measure built from ensemble mean and variance is introduced, and the paper reports that last-layer ensembles collapse in diversity during extended training.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.