REVIEW 3 cited by
LLM-Assisted Visual Analytics: Opportunities and Challenges
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We explore the integration of large language models (LLMs) into visual analytics (VA) systems to transform their capabilities through intuitive natural language interactions. We survey current research directions in this emerging field, examining how LLMs are integrated into data management, language interaction, visualisation generation, and language generation processes. We highlight the new possibilities that LLMs bring to VA, especially how they can change VA processes beyond the usual use cases. We especially highlight building new visualisation-language models, allowing access of a breadth of domain knowledge, multimodal interaction, and opportunities with guidance. Finally, we carefully consider the prominent challenges of using current LLMs in VA tasks. Our discussions in this paper aim to guide future researchers working on LLM-assisted VA systems and help them navigate common obstacles when developing these systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
ManiScope: LLM-Assisted Visual Analytics of Cryptocurrency Manipulation Risk
An LLM co-analyst plus coordinated crypto views can reduce manual evidence-seeking and organize manipulation-risk findings around user hypotheses in a 12-person practitioner study.
-
Qualitative Study for LLM-assisted Design Study Process: Strategies, Challenges, and Roles
Through interviews with 30 researchers, the paper identifies four roles that LLMs play in visualization design studies and maps them onto the nine-stage design study process.
-
GOBench: Benchmarking Geometric Optics Generation and Understanding of MLLMs
GOBench measures how well multimodal AI models generate and understand geometric optics, finding that even top models make frequent physical errors.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.