REVIEW 1 cited by
How empty are the voids?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
How empty are the voids?
read the original abstract
We find an analytical solution for the minimal matter density of a void, its central density. It turns out that the voids are not so empty: most of the voids have the central underdensity $\Delta_c \sim -50\%$ (which means that the matter density in their centers is only two times lower than in the Universe on average). For small voids (of radius $R_0\simeq 5-10$~{Mpc}), the underdensity can be significantly greater, but the number of voids decreases rapidly with increasing of $|\Delta_c|$ over $50\%$, and voids with $\Delta_c < -80\%$ are practically absent. The large voids ($R_0\ge 40$~{Mpc}) always have $|\Delta_c| < 50\%$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A semi-analytical approach to cosmic void evolution
Homogeneous spheroidal voids in ΛCDM become only slightly rounder, deviate from linear theory by z≈8, and retain substantial matter density μ>0.5 independent of eccentricity.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.