Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fast algorithms to improve fair information access in networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.03127 v2 pith:VESCSMFU submitted 2024-09-04 cs.SI cs.CYphysics.soc-ph

classification cs.SIcs.CYphysics.soc-ph
keywords algorithmsnetworksaccessinformationperformancestate-of-the-artcomparisonmagnitude
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We consider the problem of selecting $k$ seed nodes in a network to maximize the minimum probability of activation under an independent cascade beginning at these seeds. The motivation is to promote fairness by ensuring that even the least advantaged members of the network have good access to information. Our problem can be viewed as a variant of the classic influence maximization objective, but it appears somewhat more difficult to solve: only heuristics are known. Moreover, the scalability of these methods is sharply constrained by the need to repeatedly estimate access probabilities. We design and evaluate a suite of $10$ new scalable algorithms which crucially do not require probability estimation. To facilitate comparison with the state-of-the-art, we make three more contributions which may be of broader interest. We introduce a principled method of selecting a pairwise information transmission parameter used in experimental evaluations, as well as a new performance metric which allows for comparison of algorithms across a range of values for the parameter $k$. Finally, we provide a new benchmark corpus of $174$ networks drawn from $6$ domains. Our algorithms retain most of the performance of the state-of-the-art while reducing running time by orders of magnitude. Specifically, a meta-learner approach is on average only $20\%$ less effective than the state-of-the-art on held-out data, but about $75-130$ times faster. Further, the meta-learner's performance exceeds the state-of the-art on about $20\%$ of networks, and the magnitude of its running time advantage is maintained on much larger networks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Edge interventions can mitigate demographic and prestige disparities in the Computer Science coauthorship network

    physics.soc-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Women and minoritized-race CS faculty are less central in the coauthorship network, and a simulated single-edge collaboration with a top-ranked researcher can increase their centrality and predicted placement rank.

Pith tools