REVIEW 3 cited by
Predictive Coding with Spiking Neural Networks: a Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this article, we review a class of neuro-mimetic computational models that we place under the label of spiking predictive coding. Specifically, we review the general framework of predictive processing in the context of neurons that emit discrete action potentials, i.e., spikes. Theoretically, we structure our survey around how prediction errors are represented, which results in an organization of historical neuromorphic generalizations that is centered around three broad classes of approaches: prediction errors in explicit groups of error neurons, in membrane potentials, and implicit prediction error encoding. Furthermore, we examine some applications of spiking predictive coding that utilize more energy-efficient, edge-computing hardware platforms. Finally, we highlight important future directions and challenges in this emerging line of inquiry in brain-inspired computing. Building on the prior results of work in computational cognitive neuroscience, machine intelligence, and neuromorphic engineering, we hope that this review of neuromorphic formulations and implementations of predictive coding will encourage and guide future research and development in this emerging research area.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Integration of Contrastive Predictive Coding and Spiking Neural Networks
The paper shows that frozen spiking encoders, including one trained only for digit classification, can support a CPC-style predictor that distinguishes ordered digit sequences from random ones on MNIST.
-
Introduction to Predictive Coding Networks for Machine Learning
The paper derives standard predictive coding update rules and claims a 99.92% CIFAR-10 accuracy that would beat the published leaderboard, but the claim is unverified and internally inconsistent.
-
A Practical Guide to Tuning Spiking Neuronal Dynamics
A practical guide, not a research advance, that surveys encoding schemes, LIF and RAF neuron dynamics, and excitatory-inhibitory connectivity patterns with illustrative simulations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.