REVIEW 1 cited by
Uniform Estimation and Inference for Nonparametric Partitioning-Based M-Estimators
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
This paper presents uniform estimation and inference theory for a large class of nonparametric partitioning-based M-estimators. The main theoretical results include: (i) uniform consistency for convex and non-convex objective functions; (ii) rate-optimal uniform Bahadur representations; (iii) rate-optimal uniform (and mean square) convergence rates; (iv) valid strong approximations and feasible uniform inference methods; and (v) extensions to functional transformations of underlying estimators. Uniformity is established over both the evaluation point of the nonparametric functional parameter and a Euclidean parameter indexing the class of loss functions. The results also account explicitly for the smoothness degree of the loss function (if any), and allow for a possibly non-identity (inverse) link function. We illustrate the theoretical and methodological results in four examples: quantile regression, distribution regression, $L_p$ regression, and logistic regression. Many other possibly non-smooth, nonlinear, generalized, robust M-estimation settings are covered by our results. We provide detailed comparisons with the existing literature and demonstrate substantive improvements: we achieve the best (in some cases optimal) known results under improved (in some cases minimal) requirements in terms of regularity conditions and side rate restrictions. The supplemental appendix reports complementary technical results that may be of independent interest, including a novel uniform strong approximation result based on Yurinskii's coupling.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Accuracy Limits of Causal Trees for Individualized Treatment Effects
Greedy causal trees cannot uniformly estimate heterogeneous treatment effects faster than any polynomial rate, even in a constant-effect randomized benchmark, and honesty only removes a log-log factor.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.