Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CSRec: Rethinking Sequential Recommendation from A Causal Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.05872 v1 pith:GFWM2MRU submitted 2024-08-23 cs.IR cs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.LG
keywords sequentialcsrecusersdecisionsrecommendationrecommendercausalexisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The essence of sequential recommender systems (RecSys) lies in understanding how users make decisions. Most existing approaches frame the task as sequential prediction based on users' historical purchase records. While effective in capturing users' natural preferences, this formulation falls short in accurately modeling actual recommendation scenarios, particularly in accounting for how unsuccessful recommendations influence future purchases. Furthermore, the impact of the RecSys itself on users' decisions has not been appropriately isolated and quantitatively analyzed. To address these challenges, we propose a novel formulation of sequential recommendation, termed Causal Sequential Recommendation (CSRec). Instead of predicting the next item in the sequence, CSRec aims to predict the probability of a recommended item's acceptance within a sequential context and backtrack how current decisions are made. Critically, CSRec facilitates the isolation of various factors that affect users' final decisions, especially the influence of the recommender system itself, thereby opening new avenues for the design of recommender systems. CSRec can be seamlessly integrated into existing methodologies. Experimental evaluations on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed implementation significantly improves upon state-of-the-art baselines.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ManifoldMind: Dynamic Hyperbolic Reasoning for Trustworthy Recommendations

    cs.IR 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A recommender model that scores user-item pairs via beam-searched multi-hop tag paths in learnable-curvature hyperbolic space, claiming state-of-the-art accuracy, calibration, and diversity.

  2. Unified Representation Learning for Multi-Intent Diversity and Behavioral Uncertainty in Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2025-09 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A recommender model that fuses multi-intent attention with Gaussian uncertainty representations is claimed to beat SASRec and BERT4Rec, but the evidence is not reproducible as presented.

Pith tools