REVIEW 2 cited by
Auto-Stabilized Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Biharmonic Equations on Polytopal Meshes without Convexity Assumptions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
This paper introduces an auto-stabilized weak Galerkin (WG) finite element method for biharmonic equations with built-in stabilizers. Unlike existing stabilizer-free WG methods limited to convex elements in finite element partitions, our approach accommodates both convex and non-convex polytopal meshes, offering enhanced versatility. It employs bubble functions without the restrictive conditions required by existing stabilizer-free WG methods, thereby simplifying implementation and broadening application to various partial differential equations (PDEs). Additionally, our method supports flexible polynomial degrees in discretization and is applicable in any dimension, unlike existing stabilizer-free WG methods that are confined to specific polynomial degree combinations and 2D or 3D settings. We demonstrate optimal order error estimates for WG approximations in both a discrete $H^2$ norm for $k\geq 2$ and a $L^2$ norm for $k>2$, as well as a sub-optimal error estimate in $L^2$ when $k=2$, where $k\geq 2$ denotes the degree of polynomials in the approximation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
An Auto-Stabilized Weak Galerkin Method for Elasticity Interface Problems on Nonconvex Meshes
An auto-stabilized weak Galerkin method, replacing stabilizers with bubble functions, is analyzed and tested for elasticity interface problems on nonconvex polytopal meshes.
-
Simplified Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Biharmonic Equations on Non-Convex Polytopal Meshes
A stabilizer-free weak Galerkin scheme for biharmonic equations on non-convex polytopal meshes is proposed, but the norm-equivalence proof contains a degree mismatch that undermines the stated estimates.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.