REVIEW 1 cited by
Estimating Atmospheric Variables from Digital Typhoon Satellite Images via Conditional Denoising Diffusion Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This study explores the application of diffusion models in the field of typhoons, predicting multiple ERA5 meteorological variables simultaneously from Digital Typhoon satellite images. The focus of this study is taken to be Taiwan, an area very vulnerable to typhoons. By comparing the performance of Conditional Denoising Diffusion Probability Model (CDDPM) with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks (SENet), results suggest that the CDDPM performs best in generating accurate and realistic meteorological data. Specifically, CDDPM achieved a PSNR of 32.807, which is approximately 7.9% higher than CNN and 5.5% higher than SENet. Furthermore, CDDPM recorded an RMSE of 0.032, showing a 11.1% improvement over CNN and 8.6% improvement over SENet. A key application of this research can be for imputation purposes in missing meteorological datasets and generate additional high-quality meteorological data using satellite images. It is hoped that the results of this analysis will enable more robust and detailed forecasting, reducing the impact of severe weather events on vulnerable regions. Code accessible at https://github.com/TammyLing/Typhoon-forecasting.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Tropical Cyclone Forecasting via Latent Rectified Flow using Satellite Imagery and Atmospheric Fields
A latent rectified-flow model jointly forecasts nine hours of tropical cyclone satellite imagery and ERA5 winds, temperature, and pressure in one pass, beating a reproduced diffusion baseline on image quality while us...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.