REVIEW 2 cited by
Asymptotics for Random Quadratic Transportation Costs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We establish the validity of asymptotic limits for the general transportation problem between random i.i.d. points and their common distribution, with respect to the squared Euclidean distance cost, in any dimension larger than three. Previous results were essentially limited to the two (or one) dimensional case, or to distributions whose absolutely continuous part is uniform. The proof relies upon recent advances in the stability theory of optimal transportation, combined with functional analytic techniques and some ideas from quantitative stochastic homogenization. The key tool we develop is a quantitative upper bound for the usual quadratic optimal transportation problem in terms of its boundary variant, where points can be freely transported along the boundary. The methods we use are applicable to more general random measures, including occupation measure of Brownian paths, and may open the door to further progress on challenging problems at the interface of analysis, probability, and discrete mathematics.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Influence Function of Transport-based Quantiles
The influence function of multivariate transport quantiles has a pole-type singularity in dimension ≥2, so contamination near a quantile level yields unbounded first-order sensitivity.
-
Dimension-free Convergence Rate in Sliced Wasserstein Distance for Empirical Measures of Markov Processes
The claimed equivalence between sliced-Wasserstein convergence and finite-dimensional-distribution convergence fails in infinite-dimensional spaces, though the dimension-free upper bounds for Markov-process empirical ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.