REVIEW 1 cited by
Optimal ablation for interpretability
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Interpretability studies often involve tracing the flow of information through machine learning models to identify specific model components that perform relevant computations for tasks of interest. Prior work quantifies the importance of a model component on a particular task by measuring the impact of performing ablation on that component, or simulating model inference with the component disabled. We propose a new method, optimal ablation (OA), and show that OA-based component importance has theoretical and empirical advantages over measuring importance via other ablation methods. We also show that OA-based component importance can benefit several downstream interpretability tasks, including circuit discovery, localization of factual recall, and latent prediction.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Towards Unified Attribution in Explainable AI, Data-Centric AI, and Mechanistic Interpretability
A position paper unifying feature, data, and component attribution under three shared techniques, perturbation, gradient, and linear approximation, and proposing cross-attribution research directions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.