Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Hierarchical Narrative Analysis: Unraveling Perceptions of Generative AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.11032 v3 pith:5PTCOWEI submitted 2024-09-17 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords analysisgenerativehierarchicalstructuresdeepermethodnarrativeopinions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Written texts reflect an author's perspective, making the thorough analysis of literature a key research method in fields such as the humanities and social sciences. However, conventional text mining techniques like sentiment analysis and topic modeling are limited in their ability to capture the hierarchical narrative structures that reveal deeper argumentative patterns. To address this gap, we propose a method that leverages large language models (LLMs) to extract and organize these structures into a hierarchical framework. We validate this approach by analyzing public opinions on generative AI collected by Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, comparing the narratives of supporters and critics. Our analysis provides clearer visualization of the factors influencing divergent opinions on generative AI, offering deeper insights into the structures of agreement and disagreement.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Leveraging Large Language Models for Institutional Portfolio Management: Persona-Based Ensembles

    cs.CE 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Persona-ensembled GPT-4 predictions improve Sharpe ratio over buy-and-hold during rising-CPI months in a 26-month stock-bond backtest, but underperform during falling-CPI months.

Pith tools