REVIEW 1 cited by
Hierarchical Narrative Analysis: Unraveling Perceptions of Generative AI
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Written texts reflect an author's perspective, making the thorough analysis of literature a key research method in fields such as the humanities and social sciences. However, conventional text mining techniques like sentiment analysis and topic modeling are limited in their ability to capture the hierarchical narrative structures that reveal deeper argumentative patterns. To address this gap, we propose a method that leverages large language models (LLMs) to extract and organize these structures into a hierarchical framework. We validate this approach by analyzing public opinions on generative AI collected by Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, comparing the narratives of supporters and critics. Our analysis provides clearer visualization of the factors influencing divergent opinions on generative AI, offering deeper insights into the structures of agreement and disagreement.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Leveraging Large Language Models for Institutional Portfolio Management: Persona-Based Ensembles
Persona-ensembled GPT-4 predictions improve Sharpe ratio over buy-and-hold during rising-CPI months in a 26-month stock-bond backtest, but underperform during falling-CPI months.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.