REVIEW 1 cited by
The Finer Points: A Systematic Comparison of Point-Cloud Extractors for Radar Odometry
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
A key element of many odometry pipelines using spinning frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar is the extraction of a point-cloud from the raw signal. This extraction greatly impacts the overall performance of point-cloud-based odometry. This paper provides a first-of-its-kind, comprehensive comparison of 13 common radar point-cloud extractors for the task of iterative closest point based odometry in autonomous driving environments. Each extractor's parameters are tuned and tested on two FMCW radar datasets using approximately 176km of data from public roads. We find that the simplest, and fastest extractor, K-strongest, is the best overall extractor, consistently outperforming the average by 13.59% and 24.94% on each dataset, respectively. Additionally, we highlight the significance of tuning an extractor and the substantial improvement in odometry accuracy that it yields.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
RaSCL: Radar to Satellite Crossview Localization
Radar-to-satellite crossview localization with learned occupancy prediction, ICP registration, and factor-graph fusion achieves 1.3 to 4.8 m RMSE on Boreas, Oxford, and a marine dataset.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.