Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Wing Optimisation for a tractor propeller driven Micro Aerial Vehicle

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.12345 v1 pith:G7WRRY6U submitted 2024-09-18 eess.SY cs.SYmath.OC

classification eess.SYcs.SYmath.OC
keywords wingoptimisationavioncharacteristicscodedesignoperatingperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

This paper describes an investigation of the possible benefits from wing optimisation in improving the performance of Micro Air Vehicles (MAVs). As an example we study the Avion (3.64 kg mass, 1.60 m span), being designed at the CSIR National Aerospace Laboratories (NAL), Bengaluru. The optimisation is first carried out using the methodology described by Rakshith \emph{et al.} (using an in\textendash house software PROWING), developed for large transport aircraft, with certain modifications to adapt the code to the special features of the MAV. The chief among such features is the use of low Reynolds number aerofoils with significantly different aerodynamic characteristics on a small MAV. These characteristics are taken from test data when available, and/or estimated by the XFOIL code of Drela. A total of 8 optimisation cases are studied for the purpose, leading to 6 different options for new wing planforms (and associated twist distributions along the wing span) with an improved performance. It is found that the improvements in drag coefficient using the PROWING code are about 5%. However, by allowing the operating lift coefficient $C_L$ to float within a specified range, drag bucket characteristics of the Eppler E423 aerofoil used on Avion can be exploited to improve the endurance, which is a major performance parameter for Avion. Thus, compared to the control wing $W_0$ (with operating point at $C_L$ =0.7) used in the preliminary design, permitting a variation of $C_L$ over a range of $\pm$ 10% is shown to enhance the endurance of wing $W_4$ by 18.6%, and of wing $W_{6}$ with a permitted $C_L$ range of $\pm$ 50% by 39.2%. Apart from the philosophy of seeking optimal operating conditions for a given configuration, the advantages of optimising design parameters such as washout of a simple wing proposed in the preliminary design stage, is also demonstrated.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. 11Plus-Bench: Demystifying Multimodal LLM Spatial Reasoning with Cognitive-Inspired Analysis

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new spatial reasoning benchmark shows current multimodal models lag humans badly and lack the item-level predictability humans show.

  2. The Anti-Ouroboros Effect: Emergent Resilience in Large Language Models from Recursive Selective Feedback

    cs.LG 2025-09 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A recursive fine-tuning study claims quality filtering reverses model collapse, but the paper's own data show the filtered model only matched its starting score.

Pith tools