Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Flux-trapping experiments on ultra-high pressure hydrides as evidence of superconductivity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.12351 v1 pith:CGYU4ZXL submitted 2024-09-18 cond-mat.supr-con

classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords magnetizationreportedsuperconductivitybeenconsistentdataevidencefield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Flux-trapping magnetization studies on H3S at ultra-high pressure have been reported by Minkov et al. as definitive evidence of superconductivity in this hydride system. This is very helpful in a field that has become somewhat controversial. However, this conclusion has been questioned based on an apparent zero-field cooled (ZFC) linear magnetization at low field. The standard Bean model would require an approximately quadratic dependence. In support, we note that the reported ZFC magnetization is indeed super-linear and consistent both with model calculations for thin discs and with the ZFC magnetization reported for YBa2Cu3Oy films. We conclude that the reported high-pressure magnetization data is fully consistent with superconductivity and that there is no reason, in this particular data set, to reject the original inference of hydride superconductivity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reply to "Is $MgB_2$ a superconductor? Comment on "Evidence Against Superconductivity in Flux Trapping Experiments on Hydrides Under High Pressure" "

    cond-mat.supr-con 2024-11 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    Hirsch and Marsiglio rebut claims that their Bean-model analysis of trapped flux misrepresents the Meissner state, arguing the Comment plotted their equations outside their valid field range.

Pith tools