Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

WebQuest: A Benchmark for Multimodal QA on Web Page Sequences

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.13711 v2 pith:VKWVO2W6 submitted 2024-09-06 cs.IR cs.AI

classification cs.IRcs.AI
keywords multimodaldatasetinformationlikemulti-screenreasoningwebquestbenchmarks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rise of powerful multimodal LLMs has enhanced the viability of building web agents which can, with increasing levels of autonomy, assist users to retrieve information and complete tasks on various human-computer interfaces. It is hence necessary to build challenging benchmarks that span a wide-variety of use cases reflecting real-world usage. In this work, we present WebQuest, a multi-page question-answering dataset that requires reasoning across multiple related web pages. In contrast to existing UI benchmarks that focus on multi-step web navigation and task completion, our dataset evaluates information extraction, multimodal retrieval and composition of information from many web pages. WebQuest includes three question categories: single-screen QA, multi-screen QA, and QA based on navigation traces. We evaluate leading proprietary multimodal models like GPT-4V, Gemini Flash, Claude 3, and open source models like InstructBLIP, PaliGemma on our dataset, revealing a significant gap between single-screen and multi-screen reasoning. Finally, we investigate inference time techniques like Chain-of-Thought prompting to improve model capabilities on multi-screen reasoning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Routing Is Least Learnable Where It Is Most Valuable: Bounds on Representation Routing for Web Agents

    cs.CL 2026-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Per-task routing between text, image, and hybrid observations of a browser page does not currently beat one fixed choice, because the labels needed to learn routing exist only where the agent already succeeds; only a ...

  2. FullFront: Benchmarking MLLMs Across the Full Front-End Engineering Workflow

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FullFront adds a three-task benchmark for webpage design, perception, and code generation, and finds top MLLMs still fail at fine-grained layout and interaction implementation.

Pith tools