pith. sign in

arxiv: 2409.14153 · v3 · submitted 2024-09-21 · 🪐 quant-ph

Role of energy-invariant assistants in energy extraction from quantum batteries

Paranjoy Chaki , Aparajita Bhattacharyya , Kornikar Sen , Ujjwal Sen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 20:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum batteriesenergy extractionenergy-invariant assistantsjoint unitariesbattery inactivityquantum thermodynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

An energy-invariant assistant of the same dimension as the battery always allows complete extraction of all stored energy via a joint unitary that preserves the assistant's energy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that pairing a quantum battery with an energy-invariant assistant of matching size enables full discharge to the ground state. This occurs through a joint unitary acting on both systems while keeping the assistant's energy fixed at all times. The result holds for any initial battery state when the assistant state and unitary are chosen appropriately. It also supplies a necessary and sufficient condition that identifies batteries unable to release any energy even with such an assistant present in a fixed state. This clarifies when quantum batteries can be completely emptied under the energy-preservation constraint on the assistant.

Core claim

In the presence of an energy-invariant assistant having the same dimension as the battery, all stored energy of the battery can always be extracted, transforming the battery into its ground state when an appropriate joint unitary and assistant state are employed. Additionally, a necessary and sufficient condition is given for a battery to be unable to provide any energy, i.e., to be inactive, even when an energy-invariant assistant is present and prepared in an arbitrary but fixed state.

What carries the argument

The energy-invariant assistant: a system of matching dimension whose energy is strictly preserved by any joint unitary used for extraction from the battery.

If this is right

  • Every quantum battery reaches its ground state when paired with a suitable energy-invariant assistant of equal dimension.
  • The extraction process is always possible under the stated dimensional and unitary constraints.
  • A battery remains inactive if and only if it satisfies the necessary and sufficient condition provided, regardless of the assistant's fixed state.
  • The assistant's energy is unchanged at the end of any successful extraction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Dimension matching between battery and assistant appears essential for the universal extraction guarantee in this unitary class.
  • The inactivity condition offers a direct test for whether a given battery state can ever yield energy under energy-preserving assistance.

Load-bearing premise

The joint unitary must act on both battery and assistant while leaving the assistant's energy exactly unchanged.

What would settle it

An explicit battery state and same-dimension assistant for which no joint unitary preserving assistant energy succeeds in extracting all stored energy would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2409.14153 by Aparajita Bhattacharyya, Kornikar Sen, Paranjoy Chaki, Ujjwal Sen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic comparison between the energy extraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the role of energy-invariant assistants in energy extraction from quantum batteries. To this end, for energy extraction, we restrict ourselves to unitaries that jointly act on the battery and the assistant but preserve the energy of the assistant. We demonstrate that, in the presence of an energy-invariant assistant having the same dimension as the battery, all stored energy of the battery can always be extracted, transforming the battery into its ground state when an appropriate joint unitary and assistant state are employed. Additionally, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition for a battery to be unable to provide any energy, i.e., to be inactive, even when an energy-invariant assistant is present and prepared in an arbitrary but fixed state.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper studies energy extraction from quantum batteries assisted by an energy-invariant assistant, restricting to joint unitaries U that satisfy [U, H_A]=0 (preserving the assistant's energy). The central claim is that when the assistant has the same dimension as the battery, an appropriate choice of U and initial assistant state always allows extraction of all stored energy, driving the battery to its ground state. The paper also derives a necessary and sufficient condition for a battery to be inactive (unable to yield energy) even in the presence of such an assistant prepared in an arbitrary fixed state.

Significance. If correct, the result would clarify the power of energy-preserving assistants in quantum battery protocols and provide a clean characterization of inactive batteries. However, the headline extraction claim does not hold, as shown by the rank argument below; the inactivity condition may still be of interest but is secondary to the flawed central result.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (central claim): the assertion that an energy-invariant assistant of equal dimension always permits transformation of the battery to its ground state is incorrect for any initial battery state ρ_B with rank(ρ_B)>1. Because [U, H_A]=0, U is block-diagonal in the energy basis of A, so the reduced battery state is exactly ∑_k p_k U_k ρ_B U_k† where ρ_A=∑ p_k |k⟩⟨k|. Each U_k ρ_B U_k† has the same rank as ρ_B; the convex combination therefore has rank at least rank(ρ_B)>1 and cannot equal the rank-1 ground-state projector. This is a direct, load-bearing contradiction arising from the modeling choice of energy invariance.
minor comments (1)
  1. The inactivity condition is presented as a secondary result; if the authors wish to retain it, it should be clearly separated from the extraction claim and its assumptions stated explicitly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying the inconsistency in the central claim. We agree that the rank argument is correct and that the stated result on transforming any battery state to the ground state cannot hold under the energy-invariance constraint. We will revise the manuscript to correct the claim while preserving the inactivity condition, which is unaffected.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (central claim): the assertion that an energy-invariant assistant of equal dimension always permits transformation of the battery to its ground state is incorrect for any initial battery state ρ_B with rank(ρ_B)>1. Because [U, H_A]=0, U is block-diagonal in the energy basis of A, so the reduced battery state is exactly ∑_k p_k U_k ρ_B U_k† where ρ_A=∑ p_k |k⟩⟨k|. Each U_k ρ_B U_k† has the same rank as ρ_B; the convex combination therefore has rank at least rank(ρ_B)>1 and cannot equal the rank-1 ground-state projector. This is a direct, load-bearing contradiction arising from the modeling choice of energy invariance.

    Authors: We agree with the referee's rank argument. The condition [U, H_A]=0 forces the effective map on the battery to be a convex combination of unitaries, so the rank of the reduced state cannot drop below its initial value. This directly contradicts the claim that the battery reaches the rank-1 ground state for arbitrary initial ρ_B. We will revise the abstract, introduction, and relevant theorems to remove or qualify the extraction-to-ground-state statement (e.g., restricting it to pure states or rephrasing in terms of maximal extractable work under the constraint). The necessary-and-sufficient condition for inactive batteries is derived separately and does not rely on the flawed extraction claim, so it will remain unchanged. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation relies on explicit unitary constructions independent of the claimed result.

full rationale

The paper presents its central result as a demonstration via explicit choice of joint unitary U (with [U, H_A]=0) and assistant state for a same-dimension assistant. This is a standard constructive argument in quantum information and does not reduce to a self-definition, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or any load-bearing self-citation. The energy-invariance condition is an input modeling choice, not derived from the extraction claim. No equations or steps in the abstract or description exhibit the enumerated circular patterns; the derivation chain remains self-contained against external quantum-mechanical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on abstract; the work relies on standard quantum mechanics but introduces the energy-invariance restriction as a modeling choice.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Unitary operations on the joint battery-assistant system that preserve the assistant's energy are allowed for extraction.
    Stated in the abstract as the restriction used for energy extraction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5649 in / 1196 out tokens · 22171 ms · 2026-05-23T20:37:10.548646+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    How small can thermal machines be? the smallest possible refriger- ator,

    N. Linden, S. Popescu, and P. Skrzypczyk, “How small can thermal machines be? the smallest possible refriger- ator,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 130401 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    The smallest refrigerators can reach maximal effi- ciency,

    P. Skrzypczyk, N. Brunner, N. Linden, and S. Popescu, “The smallest refrigerators can reach maximal effi- ciency,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and The- oretical 44, 492002 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Necessarily transient quantum refrigerator,

    S. Das, A. Misra, A. K. Pal, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, “Necessarily transient quantum refrigerator,” Eu- rophysics Letters 125, 20007 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Three-level masers as heat engines,

    H. E. D. Scovil and E. O. Schulz-DuBois, “Three-level masers as heat engines,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 262 (1959)

    work page 1959

  5. [5]

    Heat fluctua- tions and coherences in a quantum heat engine,

    S. Rahav, U. Harbola, and S. Mukamel, “Heat fluctua- tions and coherences in a quantum heat engine,” Phys. Rev. A 86, 043843 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Entanglement boost for ex- tractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries,

    R. Alicki and M. Fannes, “Entanglement boost for ex- tractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries,” Phys. Rev. E 87, 042123 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Fundamental limi- tations to local energy extraction in quantum systems,

    ´A. M. Alhambra, G. Styliaris, B. Rodr´ ıguez, A. Nayeli, J. Sikora, and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez, “Fundamental limi- tations to local energy extraction in quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 190601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Enhancement in the performance of a quantum battery by ordered and disordered interactions,

    S. Ghosh, T. Chanda, and A. Sen(De), “Enhancement in the performance of a quantum battery by ordered and disordered interactions,” Phys. Rev. A 101, 032115 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Posi- tive and non-positive measurements in energy extraction from quantum batteries,

    P. Chaki, A. Bhattacharyya, K. Sen, and U. Sen, “Posi- tive and non-positive measurements in energy extraction from quantum batteries,” arXiv:2404.18745 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Maximal work extraction from finite quantum systems,

    A. E. Allahverdyan, R. Balian, and T. M. Nieuwen- huizen, “Maximal work extraction from finite quantum systems,” Europhysics Letters 67, 565 (2004)

    work page 2004

  11. [11]

    Daemonic ergotropy: Generalised measurements and multipartite settings,

    F. Bernards, M. Kleinmann, O. G¨ uhne, and M. Pater- nostro, “Daemonic ergotropy: Generalised measurements and multipartite settings,” Entropy 21, 771 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Quantum thermal ma- chines and batteries,

    S. Bhattacharjee and A. Dutta, “Quantum thermal ma- chines and batteries,” The European Physical Journal B 94, 239 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    The battery capacity of energy-storing quantum systems,

    X. Yang, Y. H. Yang, M. Alimuddin, R. Salvia, S. M. Fei, L. M. Zhao, S. Nimmrichter, and M. X. Luo, “The battery capacity of energy-storing quantum systems,” arXiv:2302.09905 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Thermodynamical proof of the Gibbs for- mula for elementary quantum systems,

    A. Lenard, “Thermodynamical proof of the Gibbs for- mula for elementary quantum systems,” Jour. of Stat. Phys. 19, 575 (1978)

    work page 1978

  15. [15]

    Passive states and KMS states for general quantum systems,

    W. Pusz and S. L. Woronowicz, “Passive states and KMS states for general quantum systems,” Comm. Math. Phys. 58, 273 (1978). 8

    work page 1978

  16. [16]

    Most energetic passive states,

    M. P. Llobet, K. V. Hovhannisyan, M. Huber, P Skrzypczyk, J. Tura, and A. Ac´ ın, “Most energetic passive states,” Phys. Rev. E 92, 042147 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Passiv- ity, complete passivity, and virtual temperatures,

    P. Skrzypczyk, R. Silva, and N. Brunner, “Passiv- ity, complete passivity, and virtual temperatures,” Phys. Rev. E 91, 052133 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Passivity and practical work extraction using Gaussian operations,

    E. G. Brown, N. Friis, and M. Huber, “Passivity and practical work extraction using Gaussian operations,” NJP 18, 113028 (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    Ener- getic instability of passive states in thermodynamics,

    C. Sparaciari, D. Jennings, and J. Oppenheim, “Ener- getic instability of passive states in thermodynamics,” Nature Communications 8, 1895 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Fundamental limitations to local energy extraction in quantum systems,

    ´A. M. Alhambra, G. Styliaris, N. A. R. Briones, J. Sikora, and E. M. Mart´ ınez, “Fundamental limitations to local energy extraction in quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 190601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Local passivity and entanglement in shared quantum batteries,

    K. Sen and U. Sen, “Local passivity and entanglement in shared quantum batteries,” Phys. Rev. A 104, L030402 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Strong local passivity in finite quantum systems,

    M. Frey, K. Funo, and M. Hotta, “Strong local passivity in finite quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. E 90, 012127 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Noncompletely positive quantum maps enable efficient local energy ex- traction in batteries,

    A. Bhattacharyya, K. Sen, and U. Sen, “Noncompletely positive quantum maps enable efficient local energy ex- traction in batteries,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 240401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries,

    F. C. Binder, S. Vinjanampathy, K. Modi, and J. Goold, “Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries,” NJP 17, 075015 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Colloquium: Quantum batteries,

    F. Campaioli, S. Gherardini, Q. Q. James, M. Polini, and G. M. Andolina, “Colloquium: Quantum batteries,” arXiv:2308.02277 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Dephasing enabled fast charging of quan- tum batteries,

    R. Shastri, C. Jiang, G. H. Xu, B. P. Venkatesh, and G. Watanabe, “Dephasing enabled fast charging of quan- tum batteries,” arXiv:2402.16999 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries,

    Felix C Binder, Sai Vinjanampathy, Kavan Modi, and John Goold, “Quantacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries,” NJP 17, 075015 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Charger-mediated energy transfer for quantum batteries: An open-system approach,

    D. Farina, G. M. Andolina, A. Mari, M. Polini, and V. Giovannetti, “Charger-mediated energy transfer for quantum batteries: An open-system approach,” Phys. Rev. B 99 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Auxiliary-assisted stochastic energy extraction from quantum batteries,

    P. Chaki, A. Bhattacharyya, K. Sen, and U. Sen, “Auxiliary-assisted stochastic energy extraction from quantum batteries,” arXiv:2307.16856 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Energetics of a pulsed quantum battery,

    C. A. Downing and M. S. Ukhtary, “Energetics of a pulsed quantum battery,” Europhysics Letters 146, 10001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Spin-chain model of a many-body quan- tum battery,

    T. P. Le, J. Levinsen, K. Modi, M. M. Parish, and F. A. Pollock, “Spin-chain model of a many-body quan- tum battery,” Phys. Rev. A 97, 022106 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Quantum battery with ultracold atoms: Bosons versus fermions,

    T. K. Konar, L. G. C. Lakkaraju, S. Ghosh, and A. Sen(De), “Quantum battery with ultracold atoms: Bosons versus fermions,” Phys. Rev. A 106, 022618 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    High-power collective charging of a solid- state quantum battery,

    D. Ferraro, M. Campisi, G. M. Andolina, V. Pellegrini, and M. Polini, “High-power collective charging of a solid- state quantum battery,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 117702 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Ultrafast charging in a two-photon Dicke quantum bat- tery,

    A. Crescente, M. Carrega, M. Sassetti, and D. Ferraro, “Ultrafast charging in a two-photon Dicke quantum bat- tery,” Phys. Rev. B 102, 245407 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Cavity Heisenberg- spin-chain quantum battery,

    F. Q. Dou, H. Zhou, and J. A. Sun, “Cavity Heisenberg- spin-chain quantum battery,” Phys. Rev. A 106, 032212 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Optimal quantum con- trol of charging quantum batteries,

    R. R. Rodriguez, B. Ahmadi, G. Suarez, P. Mazurek, S. Barzanjeh, and P. Horodecki, “Optimal quantum con- trol of charging quantum batteries,” arXiv:2207.00094 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Reinforcement learning optimization of the charging of a Dicke quantum battery,

    P. A. Erdman, G. M. Andolina, V. Giovannetti, and F. No´ e, “Reinforcement learning optimization of the charging of a Dicke quantum battery,” arXiv:2212.12397 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Enhanced energy transfer in a Dicke quantum battery,

    X. Zhang and M. Blaauboer, “Enhanced energy transfer in a Dicke quantum battery,” Frontiers in Physics 10 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Quantum advantage in charging cavity and spin batteries by repeated interactions,

    R. Salvia, M. Perarnau-Llobet, G. Haack, N. Brunner, and S. Nimmrichter, “Quantum advantage in charging cavity and spin batteries by repeated interactions,” Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013155 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Quench dynamics in the Jaynes-Cummings-Hubbard and Dicke models,

    R. H. Andrew and M. M. Andy, “Quench dynamics in the Jaynes-Cummings-Hubbard and Dicke models,” arXiv:2210.01355 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Quantum battery with non-hermitian charging,

    T. K. Konar, L. G. C. Lakkaraju, and A. Sen (De), “Quantum battery with non-hermitian charging,” arXiv:2203.09497 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Quantum versus classical many-body batter- ies,

    G. M. Andolina, M. Keck, A. Mari, V. Giovannetti, and M. Polini, “Quantum versus classical many-body batter- ies,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 205437 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Dimensional enhancements in a quantum battery with imperfections,

    S. Ghosh and A. Sen(De), “Dimensional enhancements in a quantum battery with imperfections,” Phys. Rev. A 105, 022628 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Fast charging of a quantum battery assisted by noise,

    S. Ghosh, T. Chanda, S. Mal, and A. Sen(De), “Fast charging of a quantum battery assisted by noise,” Phys. Rev. A 104, 032207 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Entanglement generation is not necessary for optimal work extraction,

    K. V. Hovhannisyan, M. P. Llobet, M. Huber, and A. Ac´ ın, “Entanglement generation is not necessary for optimal work extraction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240401 (2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    Enhancing the charging power of quantum batteries,

    F. Campaioli, F. A. Pollock, F. C. Binder, L. C´ eleri, J. Goold, S. Vinjanampathy, and K. Modi, “Enhancing the charging power of quantum batteries,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 150601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    Daemonic ergotropy: enhanced work extraction from quantum correlations,

    G. Francica, J. Goold, F. Plastina, and M. Paternostro, “Daemonic ergotropy: enhanced work extraction from quantum correlations,” NJP quant. info. 3, 12 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    Measurement induced synthesis of coherent quantum batteries,

    M. Gumberidze, M. Kol´ aˇ r, and R. Filip, “Measurement induced synthesis of coherent quantum batteries,” Scien- tific Reports 9, 19628 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Pairwise- measurement-induced synthesis of quantum coherence,

    M. Gumberidze, M. Kol´ aˇ r, and R. Filip, “Pairwise- measurement-induced synthesis of quantum coherence,” Phys. Rev. A 105, 012401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Quantum work extraction efficiency for noisy quan- tum batteries: the role of coherence,

    S. Tirone, R. Salvia, S. Chessa, and V. Giovannetti, “Quantum work extraction efficiency for noisy quan- tum batteries: the role of coherence,” arXiv:2305.16803 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Frustrating quantum bat- teries,

    A. G. Catalano, S. M. Giampaolo, O. Morsch, V. Gio- vannetti, and F. Franchini, “Frustrating quantum bat- teries,” arXiv:2307.02529 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Optimal charging of a su- perconducting quantum battery,

    C.-K. Hu, J. Qiu, P. J. P. Souza, J. Yuan, Y. Zhou, L. Zhang, J. Chu, X. Pan, L. Hu, J. Li, Y. Xu, Y. Zhong, S. Liu, F. Yan, D. Tan, R. Bachelard, C. J. Villas-Boas, A. C. Santos, and D. Yu, “Optimal charging of a su- perconducting quantum battery,” Quantum Science and Technology 7, 045018 (2022). 9

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Experimental analysis of energy trans- fers between a quantum emitter and light fields,

    I. M. de. B. Wenniger, S. E. Thomas, M. Maffei, S. C. Wein, M. Pont, N. Belabas, S. Prasad, A. Harouri, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, I. Sagnes, N. Somaschi, A. Auff` eves, and P. Senellart, “Experimental analysis of energy trans- fers between a quantum emitter and light fields,” arXiv:2202.01109 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Experimental investigation of a quantum battery using star-topology NMR spin sys- tems,

    J. Joshi and T. S. Mahesh, “Experimental investigation of a quantum battery using star-topology NMR spin sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. A 106, 042601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Maximal work extraction unitarily from an unknown quantum state: Ergotropy estimation via feedback experiments,

    J. Joshi and T. S. Mahesh, “Maximal work extraction unitarily from an unknown quantum state: Ergotropy estimation via feedback experiments,” arXiv:2409.04087 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Catalysis in charging quantum batteries,

    R. R. Rodr´ ıguez, B. Ahmadi, P. Mazurek, S. Barzan- jeh, R. Alicki, and P. Horodecki, “Catalysis in charging quantum batteries,” Phys. Rev. A 107, 042419 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Lipka-Bartosik, H

    L. B. Patryk, W. Henrik, and H. Y. N. Nelly, “Catalysis in quantum information theory,” (2024), arXiv:2306.00798 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Catalytic quan- tum teleportation,

    P. Lipka-Bartosik and P. Skrzypczyk, “Catalytic quan- tum teleportation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 080502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Entanglement-assisted local manipulation of pure quantum states,

    D. Jonathan and M. B. Plenio, “Entanglement-assisted local manipulation of pure quantum states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3566 (1999)

    work page 1999

  60. [60]

    Catalysis of entangle- ment manipulation for mixed states,

    Jens Eisert and Martin Wilkens, “Catalysis of entangle- ment manipulation for mixed states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 437–440 (2000)

    work page 2000

  61. [61]

    Catalytic coherence,

    Johan ˚Aberg, “Catalytic coherence,” Physical Review Letters 113, 150402 (2014)

    work page 2014

  62. [62]

    Stochastic independence as a resource in small- scale thermodynamics,

    Matteo Lostaglio, Markus P. M¨ uller, and Michele Pas- tena, “Stochastic independence as a resource in small- scale thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 150402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  63. [63]

    Limits to catalysis in quantum thermody- namics,

    N H Y Ng, L Manˇ cinska, C Cirstoiu, J Eisert, and S Wehner, “Limits to catalysis in quantum thermody- namics,” New Journal of Physics 17, 085004 (2015)

    work page 2015

  64. [64]

    Correlating thermal machines and the second law at the nanoscale,

    Markus P. M¨ uller, “Correlating thermal machines and the second law at the nanoscale,” Physical Review X 8, 041051 (2018)

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    By-passing fluctuation theorems,

    Paul Boes, Rodrigo Gallego, Nelly H. Y. Ng, Jens Eisert, and Henrik Wilming, “By-passing fluctuation theorems,” Quantum 4, 231 (2020)

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    Catalytic leverage of correla- tions and mitigation of dissipation in information era- sure,

    I. Henao and R. Uzdin, “Catalytic leverage of correla- tions and mitigation of dissipation in information era- sure,” Physical Review Letters 130, 020403 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    Catalytic transformations with finite-size environments: applications to cooling and thermometry,

    Ivan Henao and Raam Uzdin, “Catalytic transformations with finite-size environments: applications to cooling and thermometry,” Quantum 5, 547 (2021)

    work page 2021

  68. [68]

    All states are universal catalysts in quantum thermodynamics,

    Patryk Lipka-Bartosik and Paul Skrzypczyk, “All states are universal catalysts in quantum thermodynamics,” Physical Review X 11, 011061 (2021)

    work page 2021