Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Rethinking Conventional Wisdom in Machine Learning: From Generalization to Scaling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.15156 v2 pith:LTODQT4L submitted 2024-09-23 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords scalingprinciplesregularizationlargelearningmodelscalebullet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The remarkable success of large language pretraining and the discovery of scaling laws signify a paradigm shift in machine learning. Notably, the primary objective has evolved from minimizing generalization error to reducing approximation error, and the most effective strategy has transitioned from regularization (in a broad sense) to scaling up models. This raises a critical question: Do the established principles that proved successful in the generalization-centric era remain valid in this new era of scaling? This paper examines several influential regularization-based principles that may no longer hold true in the scaling-centric, large language model (LLM) era. These principles include explicit L2 regularization and implicit regularization through small batch sizes and large learning rates. Additionally, we identify a new phenomenon termed ``scaling law crossover,'' where two scaling curves intersect at a certain scale, implying that methods effective at smaller scales may not generalize to larger ones. Together, these observations highlight two fundamental questions within this new paradigm: $\bullet$ Guiding Principles for Scaling: If regularization is no longer the primary guiding principle for model design, what new principles are emerging to guide scaling? $\bullet$ Model Comparison at Scale: How to reliably and effectively compare models at the scale where only a single experiment is feasible?

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 2 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Scaling Collapse Reveals Universal Dynamics in Compute-Optimally Trained Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Compute-optimally trained networks of different sizes show loss curves that collapse onto one universal curve after normalization; with learning rate decay, the collapse is tighter than seed-to-seed noise, providing a...

Pith tools