pith. sign in

arxiv: 2409.15184 · v2 · submitted 2024-09-23 · 🪐 quant-ph

Efficient Quantum Repeater with Single Atoms in Cavities

Yisheng Lei This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 20:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum repeatersingle atomoptical cavityphoton-atom gateentanglement swappingsecret key ratemultiplexingquantum networks
0
0 comments X

The pith

A quantum repeater scheme using single atoms in cavities achieves entanglement distribution rates high enough for secret key rates of a few to hundreds of Hz over 1000 km via 10-atom multiplexing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a quantum repeater architecture that generates and swaps entanglement using photon-atom gates implemented with a single atom inside a cavity. This approach aims to overcome photon loss in optical fibers while requiring fewer experimental resources than many alternative repeater designs. The author shows that, with multiplexing across ten such atom-cavity units and modest improvements on existing hardware, the resulting secret-key rates become practically useful for distances up to 1000 km. A sympathetic reader would therefore see a concrete route to near-term long-distance quantum communication without waiting for major new technology.

Core claim

The scheme performs entanglement generation by reflecting photons from the cavity and entanglement swapping by applying photon-atom gates at intermediate nodes; both operations rely on the same atom-cavity interaction. When ten such nodes are multiplexed, the projected secret-key rate reaches a few Hz to hundreds of Hz at 1000 km under realistic loss and detection parameters.

What carries the argument

The photon-atom gate realized by a single atom coupled to an optical cavity, which performs both entanglement generation via photon reflection and entanglement swapping at repeater stations.

If this is right

  • Entanglement distribution becomes feasible at useful rates with current atom-cavity technology plus reasonable improvements.
  • A ten-atom multiplexing configuration yields secret-key rates from a few Hz to hundreds of Hz at 1000 km.
  • The same atom-cavity platform works for entanglement generation and for swapping, reducing the number of distinct components needed.
  • The architecture can be realized with several different atomic species.
  • Overall experimental complexity is lower than in many competing repeater protocols.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the gate fidelities meet the threshold, the scheme lowers the hardware barrier for first demonstrations of repeater-based quantum networks.
  • The multiplexing approach could be combined with additional parallel channels to push rates even higher without changing the core atom-cavity element.
  • Success would shift focus from proving the principle to engineering stable, long-lived atom-cavity systems at scale.

Load-bearing premise

The photon-atom gates and entanglement-swapping operations can be performed with high enough efficiency and fidelity that the calculated rates follow once the atoms are multiplexed.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures the combined efficiency and fidelity of the photon-atom gate and swapping step and finds values too low to produce the projected rates after multiplexing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2409.15184 by Yisheng Lei.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) A single atom with two ground states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) At Node A, there are a single photon source (SPS) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) BSM between Node B and Node C are performed. Measur [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Entanglement swapping can be performed between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Simulated secret key rates for communication distan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Simulated secret key rates for communication distan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Simulated secret key rates for communication dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Entanglement purification: two qubits [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a) Photon-atom gate with linearly polarized pho [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Deterministic Bell state measurement with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. (a) Simulated secret key rates for communication di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Simulated secret key rates for communication dista [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Efficient quantum repeaters are needed to combat photon losses in fibers in future quantum networks. Single atom coupled with photonic cavity offers a great platform for photon-atom gate. Here I propose a quantum repeater scheme with efficient entanglement generation and entanglement swapping based on photon-atom gates. It can be implemented with various types of atomic systems and requires much less experimental complexity compared to other repeater protocols. With current available experimental techniques and reasonable improvements, high entanglement distribution rates can be achieved. A multiplexing configuration of 10 single atoms in cavities, secret key rates in order of a few Hz to 100s Hz can be achieved for communication distance of 1000 km. This proposal paves the way for the demonstration of an efficient entanglement distribution with quantum repeaters in the near future.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a quantum repeater scheme using single atoms coupled to photonic cavities for photon-atom gates enabling efficient entanglement generation and swapping. It claims lower experimental complexity than other protocols and, via a 10-atom multiplexing configuration, projects secret key rates of a few Hz to hundreds of Hz over 1000 km with current techniques and reasonable improvements.

Significance. If the rate projections hold with supporting analysis, the proposal would be significant for outlining a lower-complexity cavity-QED-based repeater architecture that could facilitate nearer-term experimental demonstrations of high-rate long-distance entanglement distribution compared to ensemble or multi-qubit schemes.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the headline secret-key-rate projections (few Hz to 100s Hz at 1000 km with 10-atom multiplexing) are asserted without any derivation, simulation, error budget, or quantitative model for gate success probabilities, cavity coupling rates, or decoherence. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the reader cannot verify the extrapolation from single-atom performance to the multiplexed repeater.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and constructive comment. We address the major point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the headline secret-key-rate projections (few Hz to 100s Hz at 1000 km with 10-atom multiplexing) are asserted without any derivation, simulation, error budget, or quantitative model for gate success probabilities, cavity coupling rates, or decoherence. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the reader cannot verify the extrapolation from single-atom performance to the multiplexed repeater.

    Authors: The abstract summarizes the projected rates based on the protocol analysis presented in the main text (Sections on entanglement generation, swapping, multiplexing, and rate estimates using current cavity-QED parameters). However, we agree that the abstract itself does not include the supporting derivation or error budget. In revision we will modify the abstract to reference the quantitative model in the main text and add a short clarifying sentence on the basis of the projections. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; rate claims rest on external experimental assumptions, not internal derivation.

full rationale

The paper proposes a repeater protocol based on photon-atom gates with single atoms in cavities and states that secret-key rates of a few to hundreds of Hz at 1000 km follow from a 10-atom multiplexed configuration using current techniques plus reasonable improvements. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivation chain appear in the abstract or described protocol that would reduce the claimed rates to inputs by construction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked to justify the performance numbers. The projections are presented as following from unshown external assumptions about gate efficiency and fidelity rather than from any self-referential or fitted-input structure within the paper's own mathematics. This is the normal case of a proposal whose quantitative claims require separate experimental validation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on the domain assumption that efficient photon-atom gates exist and can be multiplexed; no free parameters are explicitly fitted in the abstract, and no new entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Photon-atom gates based on single atoms in cavities can be implemented with the efficiency needed for the repeater protocol
    Invoked as the foundation for both entanglement generation and swapping steps.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5644 in / 1194 out tokens · 29461 ms · 2026-05-23T20:30:22.510236+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    By using the parameters listed in the Table

    L = 1000km Here I simulate the maximum secret key rates for com- munication distance of 1000km by finding the optimal repeater parameters such as n. By using the parameters listed in the Table. II, the results are shown in Fig. 5(a). By keeping nm = 10, the results are listed in Fig. 5(b) with different qubit coherence time. By changing pCN , ηd and ηc to b...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The simulated results are shown in Fig

    Effective secret key rate There is another parameter to assess the repeater’s performance, Ref f = R 1 2nnm L Latt , (18) which is the effective secret key rate per unit resource usage and attenuation length [12, 15]. The simulated results are shown in Fig. 8. 7 200 400 600 800 1000 Distance (km) 10-15 10-10 10-5 100 105 Secret Key Rate (Hz) nm = 1 nm = 10 ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    1 × 10−4 and single photon source efficiency between 0.7 and 0.9, nm = 10. 1e-05 6e-05 0.00011 0.00016 0.00021 0.00026 0.00031 0.00036 0.00041 0.00046 0.00051 CN 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 Tcoh (s) Secret Key Rate (Hz) 9.422e-07 2.08 5.984e-07 1.368 1.694 1.824 1.894 1.937 1.967 1.989 2.006 2.019 2.029 2.648e-07 0.7688 1.046 1.155 1.214 1.25 1.275 1.293...

    work page 1924

  4. [4]

    First single photon passes through an UMZI to be prepared with the state |+⟩p = 1/ √ 2(|e⟩ + |l⟩). Subsequently the photon is sent to the first cavity and get reflected, then sent through an- other UMZI, which converts |+⟩p = 1/ √ 2(|e⟩ + |l⟩) to |l⟩, and |−⟩p = 1/ √ 2(|e⟩ − | l⟩) to |e⟩. After that, the photon is sent to the second cavity and get reflected,...

    work page

  5. [5]

    The photon is encoded with horizontal and vertical polarization

    An atomic Λ system with two ground states and one optically ex- cited state. The photon is encoded with horizontal and vertical polarization. Vertical polarization is reflected by a mirror with π phase shift. If the atom is in state |0⟩, photon with |V ⟩ state will be reflected without entering the cavity and acquire π phase shift; while the atom is in stat...

    work page 2099

  6. [6]

    12 are in state, |p, A, B ⟩ = 1√ 2 ( |+⟩ |Φ+ AB⟩ + |+⟩ |Φ− AB⟩ )

    1 × 10−4 and coherence time of the qubit between 1s and 51s, nm = 100. 12 are in state, |p, A, B ⟩ = 1√ 2 ( |+⟩ |Φ+ AB⟩ + |+⟩ |Φ− AB⟩ ) . (E1) Complete BSM with two photons reflected from both of the cavities won’t work for this case, but the complete BSM method listed in Appendix. B can be used for per- forming complete BSM, which result in deterministic ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature 453, 1023 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quan- tum internet: A vision for the road ahead, Science 362, eaam9288 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, H. J. Kimble, and H. Mabuchi, Quantum state transfer and entanglement distribu- tion among distant nodes in a quantum network, Physical Review Letters 78, 3221 (1997)

    work page 1997

  10. [10]

    Briegel, W

    H.-J. Briegel, W. Dür, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Quantum repeaters: the role of imperfect lo- cal operations in quantum communication, Physical Review Letters 81, 5932 (1998)

    work page 1998

  11. [11]

    Azuma, S

    K. Azuma, S. E. Economou, D. Elkouss, P. Hilaire, L. Jiang, H.-K. Lo, and I. Tzitrin, Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet, Reviews of Modern Physics 95, 045006 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    L.-M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Long- distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics, Nature 414, 413 (2001)

    work page 2001

  13. [13]

    Simon, H

    C. Simon, H. De Riedmatten, M. Afzelius, N. San- gouard, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, Quantum repeaters with photon pair sources and multimode memories, Physical review letters 98, 190503 (2007)

    work page 2007

  14. [14]

    A. I. Lvovsky, B. C. Sanders, and W. Tittel, Optical quantum memory, Nature photonics 3, 706 (2009)

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    Y. Lei, F. K. Asadi, T. Zhong, A. Kuzmich, C. Simon, and M. Hosseini, Quantum optical memory for entangle- ment distribution, Optica 10, 1511 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    F. Gu, S. G. Menon, D. Maier, A. Das, T. Chakraborty, W. Tittel, H. Bernien, and J. Borregaard, Hy- brid quantum repeaters with ensemble-based quan- tum memories and single-spin photon transducers, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12395 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    W. J. Munro, A. M. Stephens, S. J. Devitt, K. A. Harrison, and K. Nemoto, Quantum commu- nication without the necessity of quantum memories, Nature Photonics 6, 777 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    Muralidharan, J

    S. Muralidharan, J. Kim, N. Lütkenhaus, M. D. Lukin, and L. Jiang, Ultrafast and fault-tolerant quantum communication across long distances, Physical review letters 112, 250501 (2014)

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Azuma, K

    K. Azuma, K. Tamaki, and H.-K. Lo, All-photonic quan- tum repeaters, Nature communications 6, 1 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Buterakos, E

    D. Buterakos, E. Barnes, and S. E. Economou, Deterministic generation of all-photonic quan- tum repeaters from solid-state emitters, Physical Review X 7, 041023 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Borregaard, H

    J. Borregaard, H. Pichler, T. Schröder, M. D. Lukin, P. Lodahl, and A. S. Sørensen, One-way quantum re- peater based on near-deterministic photon-emitter inter- faces, Physical Review X 10, 021071 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Rozpędek, K

    F. Rozpędek, K. Noh, Q. Xu, S. Guha, and L. Jiang, Quantum repeaters based on concate- nated bosonic and discrete-variable quantum codes, npj Quantum Information 7, 102 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Cabrillo, J

    C. Cabrillo, J. I. Cirac, P. Garcia-Fernandez, and P. Zoller, Creation of entangled states of distant atoms by interference, Physical Review A 59, 1025 (1999)

    work page 1999

  24. [24]

    S. D. Barrett and P. Kok, Efficient high-fidelity quan- tum computation using matter qubits and linear optics, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 71, 060310

    work page

  25. [25]

    Duan and H

    L.-M. Duan and H. Kimble, Efficient engineering of mul- tiatom entanglement through single-photon detections, Physical review letters 90, 253601 (2003)

    work page 2003

  26. [26]

    Sangouard, C

    N. Sangouard, C. Simon, H. De Ried- matten, and N. Gisin, Quantum repeaters based on atomic ensembles and linear optics, Reviews of Modern Physics 83, 33 (2011)

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    event-ready-detectors

    M. Zukowski, A. Zeilinger, M. Horne, and A. Ekert, " event-ready-detectors" bell experiment via entanglement swapping., Physical review letters 71 (1993)

    work page 1993

  28. [28]

    W. P. Grice, Arbitrarily complete bell-state mea- surement using only linear optical elements, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 84, 042331

    work page

  29. [29]

    Ewert and P

    F. Ewert and P. van Loock, 3/4-efficient bell measure- ment with passive linear optics and unentangled ancillae, Physical review letters 113, 140403 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Y. Yu, F. Ma, X.-Y. Luo, B. Jing, P.-F. Sun, R.-Z. Fang, C.-W. Yang, H. Liu, M.-Y. Zheng, X.-P. Xie, et al. , Entanglement of two quantum memories via fibres over dozens of kilometres, Nature 578, 240 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Liu, X.-Y

    J.-L. Liu, X.-Y. Luo, Y. Yu, C.-Y. Wang, B. Wang, Y. Hu, J. Li, M.-Y. Zheng, B. Yao, Z. Yan, et al. , Cre- ation of memory–memory entanglement in a metropoli- tan quantum network, Nature 629, 579 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Pompili, S

    M. Pompili, S. L. Hermans, S. Baier, H. K. Beukers, P. C. Humphreys, R. N. Schouten, R. F. Vermeulen, M. J. Tiggelman, L. dos Santos Martins, B. Dirkse, et al. , Real- ization of a multinode quantum network of remote solid- state qubits, Science 372, 259 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    A. J. Stolk, K. L. van der Enden, M.-C. Slater, I. te Raa- Derckx, P. Botma, J. Van Rantwijk, J. B. Biemond, R. A. Hagen, R. W. Herfst, W. D. Koek, et al. , Metropolitan-scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits, Science advances 10, eadp6442 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Knaut, A

    C. Knaut, A. Suleymanzade, Y.-C. Wei, D. Assumpcao, P.-J. Stas, Y. Huan, B. Machielse, E. Knall, M. Su- tula, G. Baranes, et al. , Entanglement of nanopho- tonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network, Nature 629, 573 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Hofmann, M

    J. Hofmann, M. Krug, N. Ortegel, L. Gérard, M. Weber, W. Rosenfeld, and H. Weinfurter, Heralded entanglement between widely separated atoms, Science 337, 72 (2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    van Leent, M

    T. van Leent, M. Bock, F. Fertig, R. Garthoff, S. Eppelt, Y. Zhou, P. Malik, M. Seubert, T. Bauer, W. Rosenfeld, et al. , Entangling single atoms over 33 km telecom fibre, Nature 607, 69 (2022) . 13

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Krutyanskiy, M

    V. Krutyanskiy, M. Galli, V. Krcmarsky, S. Baier, D. Fioretto, Y. Pu, A. Mazloom, P. Sekatski, M. Canteri, M. Teller, et al. , Entanglement of trapped-ion qubits separated by 230 meters, Physical Review Letters 130, 050803 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Ruskuc, C.-J

    A. Ruskuc, C.-J. Wu, E. Green, S. Hermans, W. Pa- jak, J. Choi, and A. Faraon, Multiplexed entan- glement of multi-emitter quantum network nodes, Nature , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Lago-Rivera, S

    D. Lago-Rivera, S. Grandi, J. V. Rakonjac, A. Seri, and H. de Riedmatten, Telecom-heralded entangle- ment between multimode solid-state quantum memories, Nature 594, 37 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    X. Liu, J. Hu, Z.-F. Li, X. Li, P.-Y. Li, P.-J. Liang, Z.-Q. Zhou, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Heralded entanglement distribution between two absorptive quantum memories, Nature 594, 41 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Delteil, Z

    A. Delteil, Z. Sun, W.-b. Gao, E. Togan, S. Faelt, and A. Imamoğlu, Generation of heralded entanglement be- tween distant hole spins, Nature Physics 12, 218 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Stockill, M

    R. Stockill, M. Stanley, L. Huthmacher, E. Clarke, M. Hugues, A. Miller, C. Matthiesen, C. Le Gall, and M. Atatüre, Phase-tuned entan- gled state generation between distant spin qubits, Physical review letters 119, 010503 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    Li, J.-P

    H. Li, J.-P. Dou, X.-L. Pang, T.-H. Yang, C.-N. Zhang, Y. Chen, J.-M. Li, I. A. Walmsley, and X.-M. Jin, Heralding quantum entanglement between two room- temperature atomic ensembles, Optica 8, 925 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Duan and H

    L.-M. Duan and H. Kimble, Scalable photonic quan- tum computation through cavity-assisted interactions, Physical review letters 92, 127902 (2004)

    work page 2004

  45. [45]

    Niemietz, P

    D. Niemietz, P. Farrera, S. Langenfeld, and G. Rempe, Nondestructive detection of photonic qubits, Nature 591, 570 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Reiserer, N

    A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, G. Rempe, and S. Ritter, A quan- tum gate between a flying optical photon and a single trapped atom, Nature 508, 237 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    Tiecke, J

    T. Tiecke, J. D. Thompson, N. P. de Leon, L. Liu, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Nanophotonic quantum phase switch with a single atom, Nature 508, 241 (2014)

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    Hacker, S

    B. Hacker, S. Welte, G. Rempe, and S. Ritter, A photon– photon quantum gate based on a single atom in an optical resonator, Nature 536, 193 (2016)

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    Welte, B

    S. Welte, B. Hacker, S. Daiss, S. Ritter, and G. Rempe, Cavity carving of atomic bell states, Physical review letters 118, 210503 (2017)

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Welte, P

    S. Welte, P. Thomas, L. Hartung, S. Daiss, S. Langen- feld, O. Morin, G. Rempe, and E. Distante, A nonde- structive bell-state measurement on two distant atomic qubits, Nature Photonics 15, 504 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Daiss, S

    S. Daiss, S. Langenfeld, S. Welte, E. Distante, P. Thomas, L. Hartung, O. Morin, and G. Rempe, A quantum- logic gate between distant quantum-network modules, Science 371, 614 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Zhan and S

    Y. Zhan and S. Sun, Deterministic generation of loss- tolerant photonic cluster states with a single quantum emitter, Physical Review Letters 125, 223601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    Nagib, P

    O. Nagib, P. Huft, A. Safari, and M. Saffman, Robust atom-photon gate for quantum information processing, Physical Review A 109, 032602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Collins, S

    O. Collins, S. Jenkins, A. Kuzmich, and T. Kennedy, Multiplexed memory-insensitive quantum repeaters, Physical review letters 98, 060502 (2007)

    work page 2007

  55. [55]

    Ding, Y.-P

    X. Ding, Y.-P. Guo, M.-C. Xu, R.-Z. Liu, G.-Y. Zou, J.- Y. Zhao, Z.-X. Ge, Q.-H. Zhang, H.-L. Liu, L.-J. Wang, et al., High-efficiency single-photon source above the loss- tolerant threshold for efficient linear optical quantum computing, Nature Photonics , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    D. P. Ornelas-Huerta, A. N. Craddock, E. A. Gold- schmidt, A. J. Hachtel, Y. Wang, P. Bienias, A. V. Gorshkov, S. L. Rolston, and J. V. Porto, On- demand indistinguishable single photons from an effi- cient and pure source based on a rydberg ensemble, Optica 7, 813 (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    M. K. Bhaskar, R. Riedinger, B. Machielse, D. S. Levo- nian, C. T. Nguyen, E. N. Knall, H. Park, D. Englund, M. Lončar, D. D. Sukachev, et al. , Experimental demon- stration of memory-enhanced quantum communication, Nature 580, 60 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Najer, I

    D. Najer, I. Söllner, P. Sekatski, V. Dolique, M. C. Löbl, D. Riedel, R. Schott, S. Starosielec, S. R. Valentin, A. D. Wieck, et al. , A gated quantum dot strongly coupled to an optical microcavity, Nature 575, 622 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Tiecke, K

    T. Tiecke, K. Nayak, J. D. Thompson, T. Peyronel, N. P. de Leon, V. Vuletić, and M. Lukin, Efficient fiber-optical interface for nanophotonic devices, Optica 2, 70 (2015)

    work page 2015

  60. [60]

    Chang, J

    J. Chang, J. Los, J. Tenorio-Pearl, N. Noordzij, R. Gour- gues, A. Guardiani, J. Zichi, S. Pereira, H. Urbach, V. Zwiller, et al. , Detecting telecom single photons with 99.5- 2.07+ 0.5% system detection efficiency and high time resolution, APL Photonics 6 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    D. V. Reddy, R. R. Nerem, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and V. B. Verma, Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with 98% system detection efficiency at 1550 nm, Optica 7, 1649 (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [62]

    Zhong, M

    M. Zhong, M. P. Hedges, R. L. Ahlefeldt, J. G. Bartholomew, S. E. Beavan, S. M. Wittig, J. J. Longdell, and M. J. Sellars, Optically addressable nu- clear spins in a solid with a six-hour coherence time, Nature 517, 177 (2015)

    work page 2015

  63. [63]

    Le Dantec, M

    M. Le Dantec, M. Rančić, S. Lin, E. Billaud, V. Ran- jan, D. Flanigan, S. Bertaina, T. Chanelière, P. Goldner, A. Erb, et al. , Twenty-three–millisecond electron spin co- herence of erbium ions in a natural-abundance crystal, Science advances 7, eabj9786 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    Rančić, M

    M. Rančić, M. P. Hedges, R. L. Ahlefeldt, and M. J. Sellars, Coherence time of over a second in a telecom-compatible quantum memory storage material, Nature Physics 14, 50 (2018)

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    Wang, C.-Y

    P. Wang, C.-Y. Luan, M. Qiao, M. Um, J. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Yuan, M. Gu, J. Zhang, and K. Kim, Single ion qubit with estimated coherence time exceeding one hour, Nature communications 12, 233 (2021)

    work page 2021

  66. [66]

    C. E. Bradley, J. Randall, M. H. Abobeih, R. Berrevoets, M. Degen, M. A. Bakker, M. Markham, D. Twitchen, and T. H. Taminiau, A ten-qubit solid-state spin register with quantum memory up to one minute, Physical Review X 9, 031045 (2019)

    work page 2019

  67. [67]

    P.-J. Stas, Y. Q. Huan, B. Machielse, E. N. Knall, A. Su- leymanzade, B. Pingault, M. Sutula, S. W. Ding, C. M. Knaut, D. R. Assumpcao, et al. , Robust multi-qubit quantum network node with integrated error detection, Science 378, 557 (2022)

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    Bartling, J

    H. Bartling, J. Yun, K. Schymik, M. Van Riggelen, L. Enthoven, H. Van Ommen, M. Babaie, F. Sebas- tiano, M. Markham, D. Twitchen, et al. , Universal high-fidelity quantum gates for spin qubits in diamond, 14 Physical Review Applied 23, 034052 (2025)

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    S. Ma, G. Liu, P. Peng, B. Zhang, S. Jandura, J. Claes, A. P. Burgers, G. Pupillo, S. Puri, and J. D. Thompson, High-fidelity gates and mid-circuit erasure conversion in an atomic qubit, Nature 622, 279 (2023)

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    Bruß, Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography with six states, Physical Review Letters 81, 3018 (1998)

    D. Bruß, Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography with six states, Physical Review Letters 81, 3018 (1998)

    work page 1998

  71. [71]

    Scarani, H

    V. Scarani, H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, N. J. Cerf, M. Dušek, N. Lütkenhaus, and M. Peev, The security of practical quantum key distribution, Reviews of modern physics 81, 1301 (2009)

    work page 2009

  72. [72]

    Urban, T

    E. Urban, T. A. Johnson, T. Henage, L. Isen- hower, D. Yavuz, T. Walker, and M. Saffman, Ob- servation of rydberg blockade between two atoms, Nature Physics 5, 110 (2009)

    work page 2009

  73. [73]

    Welte, B

    S. Welte, B. Hacker, S. Daiss, S. Ritter, and G. Rempe, Photon-mediated quantum gate be- tween two neutral atoms in an optical cavity, Physical Review X 8, 011018 (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    Misra and E

    B. Misra and E. G. Sudarshan, The zeno’s paradox in quantum theory, Journal of Mathematical Physics 18, 756 (1977)

    work page 1977

  75. [75]

    Facchi and S

    P. Facchi and S. Pascazio, Quantum zeno dy- namics: mathematical and physical aspects, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41, 493001 (2008)

    work page 2008

  76. [76]

    M. T. Uysal, M. Raha, S. Chen, C. M. Phenicie, S. Ourari, M. Wang, C. G. Van de Walle, V. V. Dobrovit- ski, and J. D. Thompson, Coherent control of a nuclear spin via interactions with a rare-earth ion in the solid state, PRX Quantum 4, 010323 (2023)

    work page 2023

  77. [77]

    Drmota, D

    P. Drmota, D. Main, D. Nadlinger, B. Nichol, M. Weber, E. Ainley, A. Agrawal, R. Srinivas, G. Araneda, C. Ballance, et al. , Robust quantum memory in a trapped-ion quantum network node, Physical Review Letters 130, 090803 (2023)

    work page 2023

  78. [78]

    Dréau, A

    A. Dréau, A. Tchebotareva, A. E. Mahdaoui, C. Bon- ato, and R. Hanson, Quantum frequency conver- sion of single photons from a nitrogen-vacancy cen- ter in diamond to telecommunication wavelengths, Physical review applied 9, 064031 (2018)

    work page 2018

  79. [79]

    M. Bock, P. Eich, S. Kucera, M. Kreis, A. Lenhard, C. Becher, and J. Eschner, High-fidelity en- tanglement between a trapped ion and a tele- com photon via quantum frequency conversion, Nature communications 9, 1998 (2018)

    work page 1998

  80. [80]

    Bersin, M

    E. Bersin, M. Sutula, Y. Q. Huan, A. Suleyman- zade, D. R. Assumpcao, Y.-C. Wei, P.-J. Stas, C. M. Knaut, E. N. Knall, C. Langrock, et al. , Tele- com networking with a diamond quantum memory, PRX Quantum 5, 010303 (2024)

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.