Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Towards Social AI: A Survey on Understanding Social Interactions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.15316 v2 pith:DSNS5N2H submitted 2024-09-05 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords socialunderstandinginteractionsmultimodalbranchcuesnon-verbalverbal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Social interactions form the foundation of human societies. Artificial intelligence has made significant progress in certain areas, but enabling machines to seamlessly understand social interactions remains an open challenge. It is important to address this gap by endowing machines with social capabilities. We identify three key capabilities needed for effective social understanding: 1) understanding multimodal social cues, 2) understanding multi-party dynamics, and 3) understanding beliefs. Building upon these foundations, we classify and review existing machine learning works on social understanding from the perspectives of verbal, non-verbal, and multimodal social cues. The verbal branch focuses on understanding linguistic signals such as speaker intent, dialogue sentiment, and commonsense reasoning. The non-verbal branch addresses techniques for perceiving social meaning from visual behaviors such as body gestures, gaze patterns, and facial expressions. The multimodal branch covers approaches that integrate verbal and non-verbal multimodal cues to holistically interpret social interactions such as recognizing emotions, conversational dynamics, and social situations. By reviewing the scope and limitations of current approaches and benchmarks, we aim to clarify the development trajectory and illuminate the path towards more comprehensive intelligence for social understanding. We hope this survey will spur further research interest and insights into this area.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MeetingToM: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs on Theory-of-Mind Reasoning in Multi-Party Meetings

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark shows MLLMs underperform humans on meeting Theory-of-Mind tasks, especially detecting pseudo-consensus and hidden dissent.

  2. VKnowU: Evaluating Visual Knowledge Understanding in Multimodal LLMs

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 1,680-question video benchmark shows leading multimodal models lag humans by ~15 points on visual knowledge, and a See-Think-Answer RL-trained model narrows the gap.

  3. MotiveBench: How Far Are We From Human-Like Motivational Reasoning in Large Language Models?

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MotiveBench shows that large language models still lag human consensus on motivational reasoning, with GPT-4o scoring 80.89 percent and chain-of-thought prompting usually reducing accuracy.

  4. A Survey: Learning Embodied Intelligence from Physical Simulators and World Models

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Embodied intelligence learning is reviewed through the complementary lenses of physical simulators and world models, with a proposed IR-L0 to IR-L4 robot capability taxonomy.

Pith tools