REVIEW 4 cited by
Towards Social AI: A Survey on Understanding Social Interactions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Social interactions form the foundation of human societies. Artificial intelligence has made significant progress in certain areas, but enabling machines to seamlessly understand social interactions remains an open challenge. It is important to address this gap by endowing machines with social capabilities. We identify three key capabilities needed for effective social understanding: 1) understanding multimodal social cues, 2) understanding multi-party dynamics, and 3) understanding beliefs. Building upon these foundations, we classify and review existing machine learning works on social understanding from the perspectives of verbal, non-verbal, and multimodal social cues. The verbal branch focuses on understanding linguistic signals such as speaker intent, dialogue sentiment, and commonsense reasoning. The non-verbal branch addresses techniques for perceiving social meaning from visual behaviors such as body gestures, gaze patterns, and facial expressions. The multimodal branch covers approaches that integrate verbal and non-verbal multimodal cues to holistically interpret social interactions such as recognizing emotions, conversational dynamics, and social situations. By reviewing the scope and limitations of current approaches and benchmarks, we aim to clarify the development trajectory and illuminate the path towards more comprehensive intelligence for social understanding. We hope this survey will spur further research interest and insights into this area.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
MeetingToM: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs on Theory-of-Mind Reasoning in Multi-Party Meetings
A new benchmark shows MLLMs underperform humans on meeting Theory-of-Mind tasks, especially detecting pseudo-consensus and hidden dissent.
-
VKnowU: Evaluating Visual Knowledge Understanding in Multimodal LLMs
A 1,680-question video benchmark shows leading multimodal models lag humans by ~15 points on visual knowledge, and a See-Think-Answer RL-trained model narrows the gap.
-
MotiveBench: How Far Are We From Human-Like Motivational Reasoning in Large Language Models?
MotiveBench shows that large language models still lag human consensus on motivational reasoning, with GPT-4o scoring 80.89 percent and chain-of-thought prompting usually reducing accuracy.
-
A Survey: Learning Embodied Intelligence from Physical Simulators and World Models
Embodied intelligence learning is reviewed through the complementary lenses of physical simulators and world models, with a proposed IR-L0 to IR-L4 robot capability taxonomy.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.