Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Exploring Requirements Elicitation from App Store User Reviews Using Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.15473 v1 pith:4EU5ALKD submitted 2024-09-23 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords userelicitationrequirementsreviewsapplicationsllmsbertgemma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Mobile applications have become indispensable companions in our daily lives. Spanning over the categories from communication and entertainment to healthcare and finance, these applications have been influential in every aspect. Despite their omnipresence, developing apps that meet user needs and expectations still remains a challenge. Traditional requirements elicitation methods like user interviews can be time-consuming and suffer from limited scope and subjectivity. This research introduces an approach leveraging the power of Large Language Models (LLMs) to analyze user reviews for automated requirements elicitation. We fine-tuned three well-established LLMs BERT, DistilBERT, and GEMMA, on a dataset of app reviews labeled for usefulness. Our evaluation revealed BERT's superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 92.40% and an F1-score of 92.39%, demonstrating its effectiveness in accurately classifying useful reviews. While GEMMA displayed a lower overall performance, it excelled in recall (93.39%), indicating its potential for capturing a comprehensive set of valuable user insights. These findings suggest that LLMs offer a promising avenue for streamlining requirements elicitation in mobile app development, leading to the creation of more user-centric and successful applications.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. If You Had to Pitch Your Ideal Software -- Evaluating Large Language Models to Support User Scenario Writing for User Experience Experts and Laypersons

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Laypeople using an LLM writing assistant produced user scenarios rated as high in structure and clarity as those written by UX experts.

  2. REConnect: Participatory RE for Social Sustainability

    cs.SE 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    REConnect is a participatory requirements engineering framework, drawn from three community projects, that makes trust, co-design, and user empowerment the core of requirements work and assigns humans defined governan...

Pith tools