REVIEW 2 cited by
CMB and energy conservation limits on nanohertz gravitational waves
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The recent evidence for a stochastic gravitational wave background (GWB) in the nanohertz band, announced by pulsar timing array (PTA) collaborations around the world, has been posited to be sourced by either a population of supermassive black holes binaries or perturbations of spacetime near the inflationary era, generated by a zoo of various new physical phenomena. Gravitational waves (GWs) from these latter models would be explained by extensions to the standard model of cosmology and possibly to the standard model of particle physics. While PTA datasets can be used to characterize the parameter spaces of these models, energy conservation and limits from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) can be used $\textit{a priori}$ to bound those parameter spaces. Here we demonstrate that taking a simple rule for energy conservation and using CMB bounds on the radiation energy density can set stringent limits on the parameters for these models.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Can tensor-scalar induced GWs dominate PTA observations ?
A Bayesian fit to NANOGrav 15-year data finds that tensor-scalar induced gravitational waves plus primordial tensor waves can fit the PTA background, with amplitudes constrained by CMB, BAO, and PBH limits.
-
Cosmological constraints on small-scale primordial non-Gaussianity
Current pulsar-timing, CMB, BAO and PBH data constrain the small-scale local f_NL to -10.0 < f_NL < 1.2 for a monochromatic primordial power spectrum, with that constraint conditional on the spectral amplitude A_zeta = 10^-2.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.