Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Automated Assessment of Multimodal Answer Sheets in the STEM domain

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.15749 v1 pith:4HV7AL6S submitted 2024-09-24 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords stemgradingassessmentchallengesdomainevaluationtextualanswer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In the domain of education, the integration of,technology has led to a transformative era, reshaping traditional,learning paradigms. Central to this evolution is the automation,of grading processes, particularly within the STEM domain encompassing Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.,While efforts to automate grading have been made in subjects,like Literature, the multifaceted nature of STEM assessments,presents unique challenges, ranging from quantitative analysis,to the interpretation of handwritten diagrams. To address these,challenges, this research endeavors to develop efficient and reliable grading methods through the implementation of automated,assessment techniques using Artificial Intelligence (AI). Our,contributions lie in two key areas: firstly, the development of a,robust system for evaluating textual answers in STEM, leveraging,sample answers for precise comparison and grading, enabled by,advanced algorithms and natural language processing techniques.,Secondly, a focus on enhancing diagram evaluation, particularly,flowcharts, within the STEM context, by transforming diagrams,into textual representations for nuanced assessment using a,Large Language Model (LLM). By bridging the gap between,visual representation and semantic meaning, our approach ensures accurate evaluation while minimizing manual intervention.,Through the integration of models such as CRAFT for text,extraction and YoloV5 for object detection, coupled with LLMs,like Mistral-7B for textual evaluation, our methodology facilitates,comprehensive assessment of multimodal answer sheets. This,paper provides a detailed account of our methodology, challenges,encountered, results, and implications, emphasizing the potential,of AI-driven approaches in revolutionizing grading practices in,STEM education.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EducationQ: Evaluating LLMs' Teaching Capabilities Through Multi-Agent Dialogue Framework

    cs.AI 2025-04 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In simulated five-round teaching dialogues, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct produced the largest pre/post accuracy gains among 14 LLMs, and teaching effectiveness did not track model scale or benchmark reasoning scores.

Pith tools