REVIEW 1 cited by
Exploring Phase Space Trajectories in $\Lambda$CDM Cosmology with f(G) Gravity Modifications
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In this work, the cosmic solutions, particularly the well-known $\Lambda$CDM model, are investigated in the framework of the Gauss-Bonnet gravity, where the gravitational action incorporates the Gauss-Bonnet invariant function. We utilize a specialized formulation of the deceleration parameter in terms of the Hubble parameter $H$, given by $q = -1 - \frac{\dot{H}}{H^2}$, to solve the field equations. To identify the appropriate model parameters, we align them to the most recent observational datasets, which include 31 data points from the Cosmic Chronometers, Pantheon+, and BAO datasets. The physical characteristics of the cosmographic parameters, such as pressure and energy density, that correlate to the limited values of the model parameters, are examined. The evolution of the deceleration parameter suggests a transition from a decelerated to an accelerated phase of the universe. Additionally, we examine the stability of the assumed model and provide an explanation for late-time acceleration using the energy conditions. The behavior of the equation of state parameter has been analyzed through dynamical variables by constraining various parameters in light of the recent observational data. This study has resulted in a quintessence-like evolution.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Probing Dark Energy Properties in $f Q,C)$ Gravity with FLRW Cosmological Models
An f(Q,C) gravity model with an assumed transit Hubble law is fitted to H(z), supernova, and BAO data, but the fit leaves the model's own parameters unconstrained and unstated.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.