Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Autoregressive Generation Strategies for Top-K Sequential Recommendations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.17730 v1 pith:UY4MEGM3 submitted 2024-09-26 cs.IR cs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.LG
keywords generationstrategiessequentialtop-kaggregationautoregressiveapplicabilitycommonly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The goal of modern sequential recommender systems is often formulated in terms of next-item prediction. In this paper, we explore the applicability of generative transformer-based models for the Top-K sequential recommendation task, where the goal is to predict items a user is likely to interact with in the "near future". We explore commonly used autoregressive generation strategies, including greedy decoding, beam search, and temperature sampling, to evaluate their performance for the Top-K sequential recommendation task. In addition, we propose novel Reciprocal Rank Aggregation (RRA) and Relevance Aggregation (RA) generation strategies based on multi-sequence generation with temperature sampling and subsequent aggregation. Experiments on diverse datasets give valuable insights regarding commonly used strategies' applicability and show that suggested approaches improve performance on longer time horizons compared to widely-used Top-K prediction approach and single-sequence autoregressive generation strategies.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Time to Split: Exploring Data Splitting Strategies for Offline Evaluation of Sequential Recommenders

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Global temporal splits with Last or Random target selection correlate strongly with realistic successive evaluation, while leave-one-out splits produce inconsistent model rankings across datasets.

Pith tools