Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Relating Superconducting Optoelectronic Networks to Classical Neurodynamics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.18016 v1 pith:DTXV42HX submitted 2024-09-26 cs.NE

classification cs.NE
keywords modelcircuitneuronstreatmentdendritesequationsspikessuperconducting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The circuits comprising superconducting optoelectronic synapses, dendrites, and neurons are described by numerically cumbersome and formally opaque coupled differential equations. Reference 1 showed that a phenomenological model of superconducting loop neurons eliminates the need to solve the Josephson circuit equations that describe synapses and dendrites. The initial goal of the model was to decrease the time required for simulations, yet an additional benefit of the model was increased transparency of the underlying neural circuit operations and conceptual clarity regarding the connection of loop neurons to other physical systems. Whereas the original model simplified the treatment of the Josephson-junction dynamics, essentially by only considering low-pass versions of the dendritic outputs, the model resorted to an awkward treatment of spikes generated by semiconductor transmitter circuits that required explicitly checking for threshold crossings and distinct treatment of time steps wherein somatic threshold is reached. Here we extend that model to simplify the treatment of spikes coming from somas, again making use of the fact that in neural systems the downstream recipients of spike events almost always perform low-pass filtering. We provide comparisons between the first and second phenomenological models, quantifying the accuracy of the additional approximations. We identify regions of circuit parameter space in which the extended model works well and regions where it works poorly. For some circuit parameters it is possible to represent the downstream dendritic response to a single spike as well as coincidences or sequences of spikes, indicating the model is not simply a reduction to rate coding. The governing equations are shown to be nearly identical to those ubiquitous in the neuroscience literature for modeling leaky-integrator dendrites and neurons.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SuperSNN: A Hardware-Aware Framework for Physically Realizable, High-Performance Superconducting Spiking Neural Network Chips

    cs.ET 2025-09 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A physically fabricated superconducting spiking neural network chip with 5,822 Josephson junctions classifies a three-digit MNIST subset at 80.07% accuracy after 7x7 downsampling and quantization.

Pith tools