Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

HiCuLR: Hierarchical Curriculum Learning for Rhetorical Role Labeling of Legal Documents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.18647 v1 pith:HJYGWHE6 submitted 2024-09-27 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords rhetoricalcurriculumdocumentshiculrlegaldifficultydiscoursehierarchical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Rhetorical Role Labeling (RRL) of legal documents is pivotal for various downstream tasks such as summarization, semantic case search and argument mining. Existing approaches often overlook the varying difficulty levels inherent in legal document discourse styles and rhetorical roles. In this work, we propose HiCuLR, a hierarchical curriculum learning framework for RRL. It nests two curricula: Rhetorical Role-level Curriculum (RC) on the outer layer and Document-level Curriculum (DC) on the inner layer. DC categorizes documents based on their difficulty, utilizing metrics like deviation from a standard discourse structure and exposes the model to them in an easy-to-difficult fashion. RC progressively strengthens the model to discern coarse-to-fine-grained distinctions between rhetorical roles. Our experiments on four RRL datasets demonstrate the efficacy of HiCuLR, highlighting the complementary nature of DC and RC.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LegalSeg: Unlocking the Structure of Indian Legal Judgments Through Rhetorical Role Classification

    cs.CL 2025-02 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    LegalSeg provides 7,120 Indian judgments annotated with seven rhetorical roles and benchmarks several models, reporting that context-aware sequence models work best.

Pith tools