REVIEW 3 cited by
Q-Bench-Video: Benchmarking the Video Quality Understanding of LMMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
With the rising interest in research on Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) for video understanding, many studies have emphasized general video comprehension capabilities, neglecting the systematic exploration into video quality understanding. To address this oversight, we introduce Q-Bench-Video in this paper, a new benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LMMs' proficiency in discerning video quality. a) To ensure video source diversity, Q-Bench-Video encompasses videos from natural scenes, AI-generated Content (AIGC), and Computer Graphics (CG). b) Building on the traditional multiple-choice questions format with the Yes-or-No and What-How categories, we include Open-ended questions to better evaluate complex scenarios. Additionally, we incorporate the video pair quality comparison question to enhance comprehensiveness. c) Beyond the traditional Technical, Aesthetic, and Temporal distortions, we have expanded our evaluation aspects to include the dimension of AIGC distortions, which addresses the increasing demand for video generation. Finally, we collect a total of 2,378 question-answer pairs and test them on 12 open-source & 5 proprietary LMMs. Our findings indicate that while LMMs have a foundational understanding of video quality, their performance remains incomplete and imprecise, with a notable discrepancy compared to human performance. Through Q-Bench-Video, we seek to catalyze community interest, stimulate further research, and unlock the untapped potential of LMMs to close the gap in video quality understanding.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
ECBench: Can Multi-modal Foundation Models Understand the Egocentric World? A Holistic Embodied Cognition Benchmark
A benchmark and evaluation framework that tests LVLMs on embodied cognition from egocentric video, covering static, dynamic, and hallucination scenarios.
-
Q-Ponder: A Unified Training Pipeline for Reasoning-based Visual Quality Assessment
Q-Ponder is a two-stage pipeline (distill-then-reinforce) that makes a 7B multimodal model both more accurate at image quality scoring and better at explaining its judgments.
-
NTIRE 2025 XGC Quality Assessment Challenge: Methods and Results
All 19 valid entries in the NTIRE 2025 XGC quality assessment challenge outperformed their track baselines at predicting human quality scores for user-generated video, AI-generated video, and talking heads.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.