Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Q-Bench-Video: Benchmarking the Video Quality Understanding of LMMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.20063 v2 pith:7OOB64DV submitted 2024-09-30 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords videolmmsqualityunderstandingq-bench-videoaigcdistortionsevaluate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the rising interest in research on Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) for video understanding, many studies have emphasized general video comprehension capabilities, neglecting the systematic exploration into video quality understanding. To address this oversight, we introduce Q-Bench-Video in this paper, a new benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LMMs' proficiency in discerning video quality. a) To ensure video source diversity, Q-Bench-Video encompasses videos from natural scenes, AI-generated Content (AIGC), and Computer Graphics (CG). b) Building on the traditional multiple-choice questions format with the Yes-or-No and What-How categories, we include Open-ended questions to better evaluate complex scenarios. Additionally, we incorporate the video pair quality comparison question to enhance comprehensiveness. c) Beyond the traditional Technical, Aesthetic, and Temporal distortions, we have expanded our evaluation aspects to include the dimension of AIGC distortions, which addresses the increasing demand for video generation. Finally, we collect a total of 2,378 question-answer pairs and test them on 12 open-source & 5 proprietary LMMs. Our findings indicate that while LMMs have a foundational understanding of video quality, their performance remains incomplete and imprecise, with a notable discrepancy compared to human performance. Through Q-Bench-Video, we seek to catalyze community interest, stimulate further research, and unlock the untapped potential of LMMs to close the gap in video quality understanding.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ECBench: Can Multi-modal Foundation Models Understand the Egocentric World? A Holistic Embodied Cognition Benchmark

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A benchmark and evaluation framework that tests LVLMs on embodied cognition from egocentric video, covering static, dynamic, and hallucination scenarios.

  2. Q-Ponder: A Unified Training Pipeline for Reasoning-based Visual Quality Assessment

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Q-Ponder is a two-stage pipeline (distill-then-reinforce) that makes a 7B multimodal model both more accurate at image quality scoring and better at explaining its judgments.

  3. NTIRE 2025 XGC Quality Assessment Challenge: Methods and Results

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    All 19 valid entries in the NTIRE 2025 XGC quality assessment challenge outperformed their track baselines at predicting human quality scores for user-generated video, AI-generated video, and talking heads.

Pith tools