REVIEW 2 cited by
Removing Distributional Discrepancies in Captions Improves Image-Text Alignment
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this paper, we introduce a model designed to improve the prediction of image-text alignment, targeting the challenge of compositional understanding in current visual-language models. Our approach focuses on generating high-quality training datasets for the alignment task by producing mixed-type negative captions derived from positive ones. Critically, we address the distribution imbalance between positive and negative captions to ensure that the alignment model does not depend solely on textual information but also considers the associated images for predicting alignment accurately. By creating this enhanced training data, we fine-tune an existing leading visual-language model to boost its capability in understanding alignment. Our model significantly outperforms current top-performing methods across various datasets. We also demonstrate the applicability of our model by ranking the images generated by text-to-image models based on text alignment. Project page: \url{https://yuheng-li.github.io/LLaVA-score/}
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
LMM4Edit: Benchmarking and Evaluating Multimodal Image Editing with LMMs
A large human-annotated benchmark of AI-edited images (EBench-18K) plus a fine-tuned LMM metric (LMM4Edit) that predicts human preference scores across three dimensions and answers editing-specific questions.
-
MIEScore: Human-Aligned Evaluation for Multi-Source Image Editing
MIE-Bench adds 3,000 multi-source editing instances with 108K human MOSs; MIEScore, a fine-tuned multimodal LLM, achieves top correlation with human judgments on this benchmark and generalizes to several single-source...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.