REVIEW 5 cited by
FMBench: Benchmarking Fairness in Multimodal Large Language Models on Medical Tasks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have significantly improved medical task performance, such as Visual Question Answering (VQA) and Report Generation (RG). However, the fairness of these models across diverse demographic groups remains underexplored, despite its importance in healthcare. This oversight is partly due to the lack of demographic diversity in existing medical multimodal datasets, which complicates the evaluation of fairness. In response, we propose FMBench, the first benchmark designed to evaluate the fairness of MLLMs performance across diverse demographic attributes. FMBench has the following key features: 1: It includes four demographic attributes: race, ethnicity, language, and gender, across two tasks, VQA and RG, under zero-shot settings. 2: Our VQA task is free-form, enhancing real-world applicability and mitigating the biases associated with predefined choices. 3: We utilize both lexical metrics and LLM-based metrics, aligned with clinical evaluations, to assess models not only for linguistic accuracy but also from a clinical perspective. Furthermore, we introduce a new metric, Fairness-Aware Performance (FAP), to evaluate how fairly MLLMs perform across various demographic attributes. We thoroughly evaluate the performance and fairness of eight state-of-the-art open-source MLLMs, including both general and medical MLLMs, ranging from 7B to 26B parameters on the proposed benchmark. We aim for FMBench to assist the research community in refining model evaluation and driving future advancements in the field. All data and code will be released upon acceptance.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
DUCX: Decomposing Unfairness in Tool-Using Chest X-ray Agents
Tool-using chest X-ray agents show demographic disparities in tool usage, routing, and reasoning that are not visible from end-to-end accuracy alone.
-
Interpreting Social Bias in LVLMs via Information Flow Analysis and Multi-Round Dialogue Evaluation
A fairness score built from token-level attribution and pruned multi-round dialogues links LLaVA models' reliance on sensitive image regions to demographic accuracy gaps.
-
M3CoTBench: Benchmark Chain-of-Thought of MLLMs in Medical Image Understanding
A medical-image benchmark that scores the step-by-step reasoning chains of multimodal LLMs shows current models explain poorly and chain-of-thought prompting frequently reduces diagnostic accuracy.
-
MultiFair: Multimodal Balanced Fairness-Aware Medical Classification with Dual-Level Gradient Modulation
MultiFair couples modality-balancing gradient modulation with group-AUC-based fairness scaling and reports improved balanced accuracy on two glaucoma datasets.
-
VSF-Med:A Vulnerability Scoring Framework for Medical Vision-Language Models
VSF-Med introduces an eight-dimension, judge-scored vulnerability score for medical VLMs and reports that all five tested models are most vulnerable to persistent attack effects, with Llama-3.2 showing the largest drop.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.