Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Loki: An Open-Source Tool for Fact Verification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.01794 v1 pith:V2ODQ6DO submitted 2024-10-02 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords lokiclaimscostfact-checkinghumanopen-sourcetoolverification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce Loki, an open-source tool designed to address the growing problem of misinformation. Loki adopts a human-centered approach, striking a balance between the quality of fact-checking and the cost of human involvement. It decomposes the fact-checking task into a five-step pipeline: breaking down long texts into individual claims, assessing their check-worthiness, generating queries, retrieving evidence, and verifying the claims. Instead of fully automating the claim verification process, Loki provides essential information at each step to assist human judgment, especially for general users such as journalists and content moderators. Moreover, it has been optimized for latency, robustness, and cost efficiency at a commercially usable level. Loki is released under an MIT license and is available on GitHub. We also provide a video presenting the system and its capabilities.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DecMetrics: Structured Claim Decomposition Scoring for Factually Consistent LLM Outputs

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    DecMetrics scores claim decompositions for completeness, correctness, and semantic entropy, and uses them as rewards to train a small T5 model, but the evaluation is circular and it does not lift downstream fact-check...

Pith tools